This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(September 2010) |
I've changed the description of the encapsulation from LDP to MPLS. I'm 99.9% certain that this was what was intended, since LDP is a route establishment protocol, not an encapsulation one. I'd be happy for someone to correct me if I'm wrong. -- Phil Holmes 14:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Removed the text In this case, every router will connect to every other router in the VPN, which differs from the BGP-based methodology. because I think this is misleading. LDP exchanges FECs and creates LSPs with ever other LDP-speaking router on the network. I also substituted VPN with "service provider" because you can run a huge network with LDP, yet only have one L2VPN between two PEs.. the other LDP speakers aren't really part of that VPN. -- User:Prolixium 01:06 07 January 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(September 2010) |
I've changed the description of the encapsulation from LDP to MPLS. I'm 99.9% certain that this was what was intended, since LDP is a route establishment protocol, not an encapsulation one. I'd be happy for someone to correct me if I'm wrong. -- Phil Holmes 14:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Removed the text In this case, every router will connect to every other router in the VPN, which differs from the BGP-based methodology. because I think this is misleading. LDP exchanges FECs and creates LSPs with ever other LDP-speaking router on the network. I also substituted VPN with "service provider" because you can run a huge network with LDP, yet only have one L2VPN between two PEs.. the other LDP speakers aren't really part of that VPN. -- User:Prolixium 01:06 07 January 2012 (UTC)