From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thing

"Cranach probably drew on input from his lifelong friend Martin Luther" - is input the right word here. It implies he consulted which I cant picture. Ceoil ( talk) 02:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Yes, Noble says "in consultation with"... the "probably" is a hedge from other sources who hedge. Outriggr ( talk) 02:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
This role for religious art contrasted with pre-Reformation art of the recent past, such as Early Netherlandish and Italian Renaissance painting - Confused by "this role"; ie that that art actually played, or now how the Luther now saw it. Ceoil ( talk) 02:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Mistake in a reference?

Hello @ Outriggr, In this edit, you mention the source "Nadel". However, there is no such source in the article. Do you remember if it could be a mispelling and it should be "Noble" instead? Daehan ( talk) 10:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

thing

"Cranach probably drew on input from his lifelong friend Martin Luther" - is input the right word here. It implies he consulted which I cant picture. Ceoil ( talk) 02:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Yes, Noble says "in consultation with"... the "probably" is a hedge from other sources who hedge. Outriggr ( talk) 02:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
This role for religious art contrasted with pre-Reformation art of the recent past, such as Early Netherlandish and Italian Renaissance painting - Confused by "this role"; ie that that art actually played, or now how the Luther now saw it. Ceoil ( talk) 02:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Mistake in a reference?

Hello @ Outriggr, In this edit, you mention the source "Nadel". However, there is no such source in the article. Do you remember if it could be a mispelling and it should be "Noble" instead? Daehan ( talk) 10:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook