This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Law and Gospel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where's the Gospel? This article is just about how protestants regard the Law. Or perhaps the article title should be something else? Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 11:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Law and Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Law and Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Should we be linking the word “supercession” to Supercessionism? I would dispute that because the two are the same, and if they are not, it would falsely lead the reader to conclude that the Law-Gospel distinction necessarily implies that one believes in Supercessionism, as though a causative link exists between the two (which many Lutherans and Reformed hold, but not all). Whether or not a causative link is posited to exist, this issue too would require reliable sources. 142.127.187.55 ( talk) 23:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has a "this article is part of a series on Lutheranism" box. Why doesn't it also have a similar box for Calvinism? 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:10D0 ( talk) 00:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Law and Gospel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where's the Gospel? This article is just about how protestants regard the Law. Or perhaps the article title should be something else? Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 11:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Law and Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Law and Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Should we be linking the word “supercession” to Supercessionism? I would dispute that because the two are the same, and if they are not, it would falsely lead the reader to conclude that the Law-Gospel distinction necessarily implies that one believes in Supercessionism, as though a causative link exists between the two (which many Lutherans and Reformed hold, but not all). Whether or not a causative link is posited to exist, this issue too would require reliable sources. 142.127.187.55 ( talk) 23:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has a "this article is part of a series on Lutheranism" box. Why doesn't it also have a similar box for Calvinism? 2603:8001:D3F0:87E0:0:0:0:10D0 ( talk) 00:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)