From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

not enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Support as per nom. -- John B123 ( talk) 18:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I created that article on the model of the existing Inspector of the Police Integrity Commission. And there are several articles mentioning things this office has done: Visentin, Lisa (2020-01-23). "Police watchdog commissioner sacked after complaint investigation". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-04-07. The complaint was investigated by assistant inspector of the LECC, Bruce McClintock...{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link), Thompson, Angus (2020-02-25). "Strip search inquiry revived amid questions over watchdog's future". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-04-07. Asked what needed to happen to stabilise the agency, Terry Buddin, SC, the Inspector of the LECC, said...{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link), "NSW police oversight chief to step aside". The Australian. 24 Dec 2019. Retrieved 2021-04-07. The investigation was carried out by the LECC's independent inspector, Terry Buddin SC, who delivered his findings to the NSW government...{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link). I generally think that since the OILECC is a separate and independent agency from the LECC, not part of LECC–which is part of the legal design of the whole scheme, OILECC being independent of LECC ensures a perception of independence–it ought to have its own article. I think, as a general rule, if we have two independent government agencies, they each ought to have their own article. I also think one item per an agency works better for the Wikidata-Wikipedia integration Mr248 ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Support - clearly no reason for this very short stub article. Can be handled better as part of the other short article. Onel5969 TT me 23:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Done Onel5969 TT me 14:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

not enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Support as per nom. -- John B123 ( talk) 18:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I created that article on the model of the existing Inspector of the Police Integrity Commission. And there are several articles mentioning things this office has done: Visentin, Lisa (2020-01-23). "Police watchdog commissioner sacked after complaint investigation". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-04-07. The complaint was investigated by assistant inspector of the LECC, Bruce McClintock...{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link), Thompson, Angus (2020-02-25). "Strip search inquiry revived amid questions over watchdog's future". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2021-04-07. Asked what needed to happen to stabilise the agency, Terry Buddin, SC, the Inspector of the LECC, said...{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link), "NSW police oversight chief to step aside". The Australian. 24 Dec 2019. Retrieved 2021-04-07. The investigation was carried out by the LECC's independent inspector, Terry Buddin SC, who delivered his findings to the NSW government...{{ cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link). I generally think that since the OILECC is a separate and independent agency from the LECC, not part of LECC–which is part of the legal design of the whole scheme, OILECC being independent of LECC ensures a perception of independence–it ought to have its own article. I think, as a general rule, if we have two independent government agencies, they each ought to have their own article. I also think one item per an agency works better for the Wikidata-Wikipedia integration Mr248 ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Support - clearly no reason for this very short stub article. Can be handled better as part of the other short article. Onel5969 TT me 23:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Done Onel5969 TT me 14:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook