Some refs have parentheses for the years, some don't - this should be standardized.
Done.
What makes ipilot.ru and designation-systems.net reliable? Are Parsch and Martynov established experts? (Jane's calls Parsch an expert
here, so I'm inclined to accept the website on that basis, though it seems his work is largely
unpublished apart from the website).
I'd like the lead to be a little longer - maybe add some of the basic development info (development period, first flight, maybe reference the designer by name rather than the bold-ed link—which I'm not sure is correct according to the MoS, btw., etc.). I know you don't like technical information in the lead, but some basic things like speed and armament might be a good idea. This isn't that big of an issue, however. Good work overall.
Parsecboy (
talk)
00:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC)reply
Some refs have parentheses for the years, some don't - this should be standardized.
Done.
What makes ipilot.ru and designation-systems.net reliable? Are Parsch and Martynov established experts? (Jane's calls Parsch an expert
here, so I'm inclined to accept the website on that basis, though it seems his work is largely
unpublished apart from the website).
I'd like the lead to be a little longer - maybe add some of the basic development info (development period, first flight, maybe reference the designer by name rather than the bold-ed link—which I'm not sure is correct according to the MoS, btw., etc.). I know you don't like technical information in the lead, but some basic things like speed and armament might be a good idea. This isn't that big of an issue, however. Good work overall.
Parsecboy (
talk)
00:07, 14 September 2011 (UTC)reply