From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contribs) 00:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply


 Doing... Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 00:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
    Is there a source that discussed why Suzumura was replaced by Hanae as the voice actor? Given that this is a significant change, this needs to be mentioned in the article if there are sources that discuss the reasons. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC) reply
@ Narutolovehinata5: Every single Japanese actor was replaced for Hallow. TMS and Hoshino haven't explained it why. I would say somethings but it would be just theories which are not acceptable for the article. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Noted. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Reviewer comments appear to be mostly from English sources, but as Japanese reviews appear to be non-existent, this is acceptable. Balanced with Japanese merchandise and popularity poll information so this is not much of a problem. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  3. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  4. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    One 3a is resolved this will pass. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC) No more outstanding issues so this is now a pass. As always Tintor2, I suggest you nominate this for DYK. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contribs) 00:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply


 Doing... Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 00:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
    Is there a source that discussed why Suzumura was replaced by Hanae as the voice actor? Given that this is a significant change, this needs to be mentioned in the article if there are sources that discuss the reasons. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC) reply
@ Narutolovehinata5: Every single Japanese actor was replaced for Hallow. TMS and Hoshino haven't explained it why. I would say somethings but it would be just theories which are not acceptable for the article. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Noted. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Reviewer comments appear to be mostly from English sources, but as Japanese reviews appear to be non-existent, this is acceptable. Balanced with Japanese merchandise and popularity poll information so this is not much of a problem. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  3. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  4. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    One 3a is resolved this will pass. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC) No more outstanding issues so this is now a pass. As always Tintor2, I suggest you nominate this for DYK. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 02:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook