This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Now, do you have anything to add regarding her movies, acting skills, or anything else?
Atlant 23:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
(I can't believe I'm doing this) Do we have any citations claiming (even as a rumour) that her bra size is 34D? They look substantially larger to me, though Ms. San Giacomo may be quite short in real life and so they may appear larger than they actually are. -- Yamla June 30, 2005 20:51 (UTC)
For those who missed it, there was a complete section of this article - eight paragraphs long - discussing Laura San Giacomo's breasts. If it hadn't been deleted, I was going to suggest it be split off and turned into a seperate article. Maybe we could start a whole category of celebrity bodyparts articles: Laura San Giacomo's breasts, Paul Newman's eyes, Betty Grable's legs, Jimmy Durante's nose, Jennifer Lopez' ass. MK2 16:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
i cant believe im doing this now....
even though her breast size was a somewhat running gag on the show, i dont think it should be incorporated on her personal page. all the "information" is specualtive, and has no place in an area designated to talk about her body of work. if it stayed on the page, why not put it under the notes as a single sentence? i suggest moving the larger part of the article to the just shoot me page. maybe in the notes section, which could eventually be turned into a "running gag" list-- Macready 06:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
That is a completely unflattering picture of Ms. Giacomo. Certainly, someone has something better to post. How about a picture of her as Nadine in The Stand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GestaltG ( talk • contribs) .
The fact that 8 paragraphs of breast talk were deleted is a sure sign that Wikipedia is broken. Put it back.
-- Dylan 69.11.48.26
Hey, I will replace her picture with a new one. Hope nobody minds.
P.S. This article is full of personal comments (e.g. "if nothing else, the actress"...). It is more like a TV magazine article than a Wikipedia article. Unsuitable in terms of style, it should undergo a cleanup (good command of language, though!) Xanthi22 00:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok, now I'm thinking it, I'm not removing the already existing picture (which is awful). I will just add a new one (the movie poster from Nina Takes a Lover). I've found better pictures of her but they are either copyrighted or I don't know the source(many viscaps, too). If somebody objects to the new picture, please let me know.
Xanthi22 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't like the photo that is up now (5/12/2015) -- she seems to be squinting like the light is in her eyes (which I probably was). IT HAS TO GO!-- 24.177.0.156 ( talk) 16:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I've posted two new images. In case they are also deemed unsuitable, please let me know.
Xanthi22 21:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
why don't they mention the fact that she was the narrator on the show snapped? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecerda ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Worldcat, which I'd take as more reliable than those syndicated "Who was born today" pieces, reports a 1962 birthdate. For every one of the syndicated pieces giving one date, it's easy enough to find one giving the other, eg [1]. I've noted the discrepancy in the ref/footnote. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 16:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Can someone add the TV movie
Talhotblond and correct the order. ThanksCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
141.217.233.69 (
talk) 19:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laura San Giacomo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Fuaacena: You have made several edits on this page on the Television and Filmography sections. You have deleted the entire Filmography Section. You have deleted and replaced the entire Television section.
What are you doing? These edits and other edits you have done appear to be test edits. If you are learning how to edit Wikipedia articles, please do test edits in your sandbox.
Continuing to edit in this manner would be vandalism.
Please stop doing these types of edits.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Now, do you have anything to add regarding her movies, acting skills, or anything else?
Atlant 23:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
(I can't believe I'm doing this) Do we have any citations claiming (even as a rumour) that her bra size is 34D? They look substantially larger to me, though Ms. San Giacomo may be quite short in real life and so they may appear larger than they actually are. -- Yamla June 30, 2005 20:51 (UTC)
For those who missed it, there was a complete section of this article - eight paragraphs long - discussing Laura San Giacomo's breasts. If it hadn't been deleted, I was going to suggest it be split off and turned into a seperate article. Maybe we could start a whole category of celebrity bodyparts articles: Laura San Giacomo's breasts, Paul Newman's eyes, Betty Grable's legs, Jimmy Durante's nose, Jennifer Lopez' ass. MK2 16:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
i cant believe im doing this now....
even though her breast size was a somewhat running gag on the show, i dont think it should be incorporated on her personal page. all the "information" is specualtive, and has no place in an area designated to talk about her body of work. if it stayed on the page, why not put it under the notes as a single sentence? i suggest moving the larger part of the article to the just shoot me page. maybe in the notes section, which could eventually be turned into a "running gag" list-- Macready 06:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
That is a completely unflattering picture of Ms. Giacomo. Certainly, someone has something better to post. How about a picture of her as Nadine in The Stand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GestaltG ( talk • contribs) .
The fact that 8 paragraphs of breast talk were deleted is a sure sign that Wikipedia is broken. Put it back.
-- Dylan 69.11.48.26
Hey, I will replace her picture with a new one. Hope nobody minds.
P.S. This article is full of personal comments (e.g. "if nothing else, the actress"...). It is more like a TV magazine article than a Wikipedia article. Unsuitable in terms of style, it should undergo a cleanup (good command of language, though!) Xanthi22 00:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok, now I'm thinking it, I'm not removing the already existing picture (which is awful). I will just add a new one (the movie poster from Nina Takes a Lover). I've found better pictures of her but they are either copyrighted or I don't know the source(many viscaps, too). If somebody objects to the new picture, please let me know.
Xanthi22 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't like the photo that is up now (5/12/2015) -- she seems to be squinting like the light is in her eyes (which I probably was). IT HAS TO GO!-- 24.177.0.156 ( talk) 16:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I've posted two new images. In case they are also deemed unsuitable, please let me know.
Xanthi22 21:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
why don't they mention the fact that she was the narrator on the show snapped? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecerda ( talk • contribs) 15:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Worldcat, which I'd take as more reliable than those syndicated "Who was born today" pieces, reports a 1962 birthdate. For every one of the syndicated pieces giving one date, it's easy enough to find one giving the other, eg [1]. I've noted the discrepancy in the ref/footnote. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 16:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Can someone add the TV movie
Talhotblond and correct the order. ThanksCite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
141.217.233.69 (
talk) 19:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laura San Giacomo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Fuaacena: You have made several edits on this page on the Television and Filmography sections. You have deleted the entire Filmography Section. You have deleted and replaced the entire Television section.
What are you doing? These edits and other edits you have done appear to be test edits. If you are learning how to edit Wikipedia articles, please do test edits in your sandbox.
Continuing to edit in this manner would be vandalism.
Please stop doing these types of edits.