This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I just rv'ed the following, poorly presented critique of Mulvey:
The author is quoting Paglia from http://www.salon.com/it/col/pagl/1998/10/07pagl.html , but he/she is doing so inaccurately. In the Salon piece, Paglia is attacking "poststructuralist and postmodernist theory" with that phrase, but not exactly from the perspective of this author. Also, the author's critique has numerous spelling/grammatical problems and was incorrectly placed in the "References" section of the article. A critique of poststructuralist film theory and Mulvey's place in it would be appropriate for this article, but it needs to be better presented than this edit was. -- Jeremy Butler 12:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
In 1972 critic, author, and painter John Berger published a collection of essays called " Ways of Seeing" where he notes that the whole tradition of the female nude in Western art is the story of “men look[ing and] women watch[ing] themselves being looked at”. Is there any evidence he influenced Mulvey? Malick78 13:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's the beginning of every paragraph in this section:
On the last provides anything close to a secure hand rail in the first 39 steps. — MaxEnt 22:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
In the section 'As a filmmaker', it is noted that perhaps Mulvey's most influential film was Riddles of the Sphinx. I take issue with this for a couple of reasons. First, just because the film is most watched or has a Wikipedia page does not mean that it was the most influential, the definition of influential varies heavily from person to person. It is impossible or nearly impossible to quantity. Second, there are no citations stating the Riddles of the Sphinx was the most consumed film. Should this passage not say that Riddles of the Sphinx was the most viewed (or popular) film, instead of a qualitative guess at its influence? Mcorningmyers ( talk) 05:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I just rv'ed the following, poorly presented critique of Mulvey:
The author is quoting Paglia from http://www.salon.com/it/col/pagl/1998/10/07pagl.html , but he/she is doing so inaccurately. In the Salon piece, Paglia is attacking "poststructuralist and postmodernist theory" with that phrase, but not exactly from the perspective of this author. Also, the author's critique has numerous spelling/grammatical problems and was incorrectly placed in the "References" section of the article. A critique of poststructuralist film theory and Mulvey's place in it would be appropriate for this article, but it needs to be better presented than this edit was. -- Jeremy Butler 12:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
In 1972 critic, author, and painter John Berger published a collection of essays called " Ways of Seeing" where he notes that the whole tradition of the female nude in Western art is the story of “men look[ing and] women watch[ing] themselves being looked at”. Is there any evidence he influenced Mulvey? Malick78 13:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's the beginning of every paragraph in this section:
On the last provides anything close to a secure hand rail in the first 39 steps. — MaxEnt 22:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
In the section 'As a filmmaker', it is noted that perhaps Mulvey's most influential film was Riddles of the Sphinx. I take issue with this for a couple of reasons. First, just because the film is most watched or has a Wikipedia page does not mean that it was the most influential, the definition of influential varies heavily from person to person. It is impossible or nearly impossible to quantity. Second, there are no citations stating the Riddles of the Sphinx was the most consumed film. Should this passage not say that Riddles of the Sphinx was the most viewed (or popular) film, instead of a qualitative guess at its influence? Mcorningmyers ( talk) 05:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)