This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. Library of Congress Catalog Records for all six books (2006 to 2012). I used these records as sources today but provided a formal reference only for one of them.
2. Catalog records for A Gypsy at Almack's (1993) by Chloe Cheshire
To identify Chloe Cheshire as Schlitz we need a reference. I think we should have that simply to mention the 1993 book in this article.
3. Information about A Clamor of Children (2005), evidently a version of Good Masters!. (Note also that LCCat notes "original title" Villeins and Vermin, Simpleton and Saints for Good Masters! [3].)
4. 2008 Newbery Medal acceptance speech ( p148ff excluding p151)
-- P64 ( talk) 04:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Re:
this change of mine, boldface in the infobox's awards section is unnecessary and contravenes
MOS:BOLD as it tends to emphasize and draw undue attention to the awards and away from the other content in the box.
Template:Infobox writer doesn't instruct the use of boldface when using {{
awd}} templates. Either get consensus at the template to change the instructions, or a local consensus should be achieved here, with some argument other than "I like it better". Myriad Pro has argued that boldface makes it easier
to understand, but we're talking about two lines of data for each award. And the "Notable awards" section is bolded. Also, the |pseudonym=
parameter, per template instructions is to be propagated with a name, not with titles associated with those names. Note
Stephen King. The specifics should be detailed in the article prose, not in the infobox. Infoboxes are too commonly misused as repositories for excessive data.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
15:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. Library of Congress Catalog Records for all six books (2006 to 2012). I used these records as sources today but provided a formal reference only for one of them.
2. Catalog records for A Gypsy at Almack's (1993) by Chloe Cheshire
To identify Chloe Cheshire as Schlitz we need a reference. I think we should have that simply to mention the 1993 book in this article.
3. Information about A Clamor of Children (2005), evidently a version of Good Masters!. (Note also that LCCat notes "original title" Villeins and Vermin, Simpleton and Saints for Good Masters! [3].)
4. 2008 Newbery Medal acceptance speech ( p148ff excluding p151)
-- P64 ( talk) 04:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Re:
this change of mine, boldface in the infobox's awards section is unnecessary and contravenes
MOS:BOLD as it tends to emphasize and draw undue attention to the awards and away from the other content in the box.
Template:Infobox writer doesn't instruct the use of boldface when using {{
awd}} templates. Either get consensus at the template to change the instructions, or a local consensus should be achieved here, with some argument other than "I like it better". Myriad Pro has argued that boldface makes it easier
to understand, but we're talking about two lines of data for each award. And the "Notable awards" section is bolded. Also, the |pseudonym=
parameter, per template instructions is to be propagated with a name, not with titles associated with those names. Note
Stephen King. The specifics should be detailed in the article prose, not in the infobox. Infoboxes are too commonly misused as repositories for excessive data.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
15:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)