![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Launceston Synagogue. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is about objective, encyclopedic content. An enthusiastic paragraph about how the local community was "rejuvenated" by Chabad, backed by nothing more than a Chabad website, is pushing POV. The Chabad website will simply publicize any story provided by the local Chabad people, and as such is not an objective source whatsoever. Even the local "The Examiner" paper, quoted in the second paragraph removed, will, in this case, of a story about synagogue service details, simply publish these details as provided to them by locals, as it does with dozens of other private clubs/organizations/people. While The Examiner is itself a respectable newspaper, claims about synagogue services' details are hardly likely to be scrutinized, but rather simply published as provided to it by locals. The Examiner's editors, in this case, may very well not even understand the meaning of the published synagogue services' details, nor care about these one bit. Therefore, the removed paragraphs contain unverifiable self-promotional material, which may belong in self-promotional websites like the referenced Chabad website, or even as a community service announcement in the local newspaper which would probably mean practically nothing to 99% of the newspaper readership - but not in any serious encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.118.118 ( talk) 06:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Launceston Synagogue. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is about objective, encyclopedic content. An enthusiastic paragraph about how the local community was "rejuvenated" by Chabad, backed by nothing more than a Chabad website, is pushing POV. The Chabad website will simply publicize any story provided by the local Chabad people, and as such is not an objective source whatsoever. Even the local "The Examiner" paper, quoted in the second paragraph removed, will, in this case, of a story about synagogue service details, simply publish these details as provided to them by locals, as it does with dozens of other private clubs/organizations/people. While The Examiner is itself a respectable newspaper, claims about synagogue services' details are hardly likely to be scrutinized, but rather simply published as provided to it by locals. The Examiner's editors, in this case, may very well not even understand the meaning of the published synagogue services' details, nor care about these one bit. Therefore, the removed paragraphs contain unverifiable self-promotional material, which may belong in self-promotional websites like the referenced Chabad website, or even as a community service announcement in the local newspaper which would probably mean practically nothing to 99% of the newspaper readership - but not in any serious encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.118.118 ( talk) 06:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)