This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 20 February 2018 by reviewer Dodger67 ( talk · contribs). Electronics Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

@ Dial911: Why did you leave the comment "Seems to be failing WP:Verifiability" on the page? It looks thoroughly referenced to me so I have removed your comment. Please be more specific on what your concerns are. Spinning Spark 20:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Spinningspark: Sources were not accessible. Thus, I left the comment and pinged others for help at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Draft:Lattice_and_bridged-T_equalizers Any miscommunication is regretted. Dial911 ( talk) 20:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

"Not accessible" does not equal "not verifiable". We are supposed to WP:AGF offline/paywalled sources unless there is good reason not to. Such sources are verifiable, just not so easily. A comment like that at the head of the article is likely to lead reviewers to unnecessarily fail it. It shouldn't be there unless you have some real concerns. Spinning Spark 20:56, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Noted. Thanks! Dial911 ( talk) 20:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply