![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are there any images of the original Lateran Palace that Sixtus V tore down? john k ( talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The first paragraph, "Pre-Papal History," mentions only the basilica, not the palace itself -- but nowhere is there a statement of when the original palace (or the basilica) was first constructed, only when it was given over to the papacy. Anybody know? -- Michael K Smith Talk 18:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
This article needs attention from a copy editor; the author wrote almost the entire article in the passive voice. Help, please! Foreignshore ( talk) 16:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Foreignshore
From what I understand, the Palace is on Italian soil, but owned by the Vatican and having diplomatic status (similar to an embassy). Is that correct? If so, the information should be in the lede, because otherwise readers might infer that the Palace is in Vatican City. Mathew5000 ( talk) 22:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lateran Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Wasn't this disproven centuries ago when the Donation of Constantine was proven to be a forgery? Or is there additional evidence? If so, it's lacking. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her ( talk) 21:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are there any images of the original Lateran Palace that Sixtus V tore down? john k ( talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
The first paragraph, "Pre-Papal History," mentions only the basilica, not the palace itself -- but nowhere is there a statement of when the original palace (or the basilica) was first constructed, only when it was given over to the papacy. Anybody know? -- Michael K Smith Talk 18:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
This article needs attention from a copy editor; the author wrote almost the entire article in the passive voice. Help, please! Foreignshore ( talk) 16:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Foreignshore
From what I understand, the Palace is on Italian soil, but owned by the Vatican and having diplomatic status (similar to an embassy). Is that correct? If so, the information should be in the lede, because otherwise readers might infer that the Palace is in Vatican City. Mathew5000 ( talk) 22:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lateran Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Wasn't this disproven centuries ago when the Donation of Constantine was proven to be a forgery? Or is there additional evidence? If so, it's lacking. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her ( talk) 21:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)