This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
Talk:Later Zhou Dynasty which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
RMCD bot 19:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not movedXoloz (
talk) 15:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Later Jin (Five Dynasties) → Later Jin DynastyLater Jin – There is no need for the disambiguator — the 17th century state is really never discussed separately from its eventual name (
Qin Dynasty), and that has been recognized such in that it does not have a separate article of its own, nor separate categories.
Nlu (
talk) 03:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose: Think you meant
Qing Dynasty not
Qin Dynasty. Besides that, the Manchu state of the Later Jin could be confused with this article and so disambiguation is required between the two. It is not enough to say that it is usual called the [Qing Dynasty]], because it is still often called the Later Jin—especially when talking about the period of time prior to the capture of Beijing when the Later Jin is the only practical name. The Five Dynasties name hasn't established itself as the primary topic for the name
Later Jin Dynasty thus neither article should use that name and both articles should contain a disambiguation term as they do today.
Rincewind42 (
talk) 06:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. I think the page was just moved from "Later Jin Dynasty" to "Later Jin" (see
Talk:Later Zhou Dynasty#Requested move), and then disambiguated as "Later Jin (Five Dynasties)" to differentiate it from the "Later Jin" that preceded the
Qing. Moving if back to "Later Jin Dynasty" would put it back where it was, and would break the (admittedly not overwhelming) consensus to remove "dynasty" from a few titles like
Southern Ming,
Later Zhou, etc. Maybe we could move it back to "Later Jin" tout court for the reasons
Nlu gives?
Madalibi (
talk) 06:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment I made a mental mistake. I meant to propose that it be moved (again) to
Later Jin, not
Later Jin Dynasty. --
Nlu (
talk) 15:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I've adjusted your proposal accordingly
[1]. --
Cold Season (
talk) 18:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Mildly oppose I'm not the one who moved the page to "Later Jin (Five Dynasties)", and I was also initially taken aback by the move. However, after some thinking, I think it's inevitable that someone will create a page
Later Jin (Manchu) in the future. After all, there are already
6 language versions of the Manchu state. Once that page is created, the Five Dynasty state can no longer be the primary topic, it's even shorter in duration! So I think it's probably best to leave it the way it is, rather than move it now, and having to move it back in the future.
Timmyshin (
talk) 17:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on
Talk:Later Zhou Dynasty which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
RMCD bot 19:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not movedXoloz (
talk) 15:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Later Jin (Five Dynasties) → Later Jin DynastyLater Jin – There is no need for the disambiguator — the 17th century state is really never discussed separately from its eventual name (
Qin Dynasty), and that has been recognized such in that it does not have a separate article of its own, nor separate categories.
Nlu (
talk) 03:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose: Think you meant
Qing Dynasty not
Qin Dynasty. Besides that, the Manchu state of the Later Jin could be confused with this article and so disambiguation is required between the two. It is not enough to say that it is usual called the [Qing Dynasty]], because it is still often called the Later Jin—especially when talking about the period of time prior to the capture of Beijing when the Later Jin is the only practical name. The Five Dynasties name hasn't established itself as the primary topic for the name
Later Jin Dynasty thus neither article should use that name and both articles should contain a disambiguation term as they do today.
Rincewind42 (
talk) 06:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. I think the page was just moved from "Later Jin Dynasty" to "Later Jin" (see
Talk:Later Zhou Dynasty#Requested move), and then disambiguated as "Later Jin (Five Dynasties)" to differentiate it from the "Later Jin" that preceded the
Qing. Moving if back to "Later Jin Dynasty" would put it back where it was, and would break the (admittedly not overwhelming) consensus to remove "dynasty" from a few titles like
Southern Ming,
Later Zhou, etc. Maybe we could move it back to "Later Jin" tout court for the reasons
Nlu gives?
Madalibi (
talk) 06:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment I made a mental mistake. I meant to propose that it be moved (again) to
Later Jin, not
Later Jin Dynasty. --
Nlu (
talk) 15:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I've adjusted your proposal accordingly
[1]. --
Cold Season (
talk) 18:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Mildly oppose I'm not the one who moved the page to "Later Jin (Five Dynasties)", and I was also initially taken aback by the move. However, after some thinking, I think it's inevitable that someone will create a page
Later Jin (Manchu) in the future. After all, there are already
6 language versions of the Manchu state. Once that page is created, the Five Dynasty state can no longer be the primary topic, it's even shorter in duration! So I think it's probably best to leave it the way it is, rather than move it now, and having to move it back in the future.
Timmyshin (
talk) 17:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.