This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles This redirect is supported by Moon task force. This redirect is supported by Solar System task force. Geology Mid‑importance Talk:Late Imbrian is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Late Imbrian page were merged into Imbrian on 21 October 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.

Please permit me to post the details at: http://www.astronomyforum.net/moon-forum/92808-explanation-lunar-mare.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.48.24 ( talk) 12:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An epoch is a geochronological unit of time. Geochronological units are called Late Imbrian etc. Upper Imbrian indicates that it's a chronostratigraphic unit i.e. segments of rock. During the Late Imbrian epoch the Upper Imbrian series (rock segments) were created. The {{Timeline_Lunar_Geological_Timescale}} is wrong too. --Regards, Necessary Evil ( talk) 23:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Both articles are blue in the chart and can easily be treated within one article, even though they might have distinctive characteristics. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 05:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Agreed and  Done, merging both to the Imbrian page, formerly just a dab for these two pages. Klbrain ( talk) 22:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply