Late December 2012 North American storm complex was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 14, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Late December 2012 North American storm complex was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 20, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Late December 2012 North American storm complex was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 5, 2013). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tstorm123.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Should we include the tornado(s) from December 26 as well? They're really part of the same system, although they didn't happen on Christmas, per se. Inks.LWC ( talk) 21:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
So, the blizzard and the tornado outbreak were both from the same meteorological system. Should they be merged? Right now the blizzard article is pretty scant right now. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Given how short the blizzard article is, and again, since they were the same meteorological system, should the two articles be merged? It is now after the fact for there to be proper analysis. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, as an update, the blizzard article was merged into this, and the title was changed. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Juliancolton ( talk · contribs) 04:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey,
I'm in the process of reviewing this article. I haven't made any decision yet, but I'll be adding comments as I go along. Here goes:
Overall, I feel the article has a couple overarching issues. The first is the article's attempt at sounding meteorologically advanced without an actual grasp on the meteorology. In other words, I see many extremely obscure terms thrown together in dubious order. Another is a lack of sources, and by extension a somewhat shaky account of damages. Also, the prose is somewhat weak, but that can be overcome once the content is good. Sadly, I don't think these issues are fixable within just days, so I feel I have to fail this GAN nom. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, and happy new year to the author. Juliancolton ( talk) 04:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gilderien ( talk · contribs) 13:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I first read through the article and see if there is anything that jumps out at me, and note it down to be fixed. I also check to see if any references are dead. For example:
-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 13:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Since over a week has passed, and most of these issues have not been addressed, and the nominator has been active elsewhere, I am failing this review. -- Gilderien Chat| Contributions 05:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
It looks a bit awkwardly wide at this point now that the Damage and reference columns are back in. Do we really need those columns in there? There's nothing really outstanding about any of the max widths that seem to support putting that in (unless United States Man has more to add), and we can always just include damage amounts in the Summary column. I'd also put all of the references at the end of the summary to make it look better. Looking at the articles for all of the tornado outbreak articles for 2013, none had their own damage or reference columns, and most of the other 2012 articles didn't have Max Width columns, so that one might be able to be removed as well. Inks.LWC ( talk) 04:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Where did we get the >$150 million from? Inks.LWC ( talk) 05:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Late December 2012 North American storm complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Late December 2012 North American storm complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.kalb.com/story/20436006/tioga-unites-after-tornadoWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Late December 2012 North American storm complex was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 14, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Late December 2012 North American storm complex was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 20, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Late December 2012 North American storm complex was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 5, 2013). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tstorm123.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Should we include the tornado(s) from December 26 as well? They're really part of the same system, although they didn't happen on Christmas, per se. Inks.LWC ( talk) 21:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
So, the blizzard and the tornado outbreak were both from the same meteorological system. Should they be merged? Right now the blizzard article is pretty scant right now. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Given how short the blizzard article is, and again, since they were the same meteorological system, should the two articles be merged? It is now after the fact for there to be proper analysis. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, as an update, the blizzard article was merged into this, and the title was changed. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 17:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Juliancolton ( talk · contribs) 04:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey,
I'm in the process of reviewing this article. I haven't made any decision yet, but I'll be adding comments as I go along. Here goes:
Overall, I feel the article has a couple overarching issues. The first is the article's attempt at sounding meteorologically advanced without an actual grasp on the meteorology. In other words, I see many extremely obscure terms thrown together in dubious order. Another is a lack of sources, and by extension a somewhat shaky account of damages. Also, the prose is somewhat weak, but that can be overcome once the content is good. Sadly, I don't think these issues are fixable within just days, so I feel I have to fail this GAN nom. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, and happy new year to the author. Juliancolton ( talk) 04:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gilderien ( talk · contribs) 13:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I first read through the article and see if there is anything that jumps out at me, and note it down to be fixed. I also check to see if any references are dead. For example:
-- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 13:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Since over a week has passed, and most of these issues have not been addressed, and the nominator has been active elsewhere, I am failing this review. -- Gilderien Chat| Contributions 05:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
It looks a bit awkwardly wide at this point now that the Damage and reference columns are back in. Do we really need those columns in there? There's nothing really outstanding about any of the max widths that seem to support putting that in (unless United States Man has more to add), and we can always just include damage amounts in the Summary column. I'd also put all of the references at the end of the summary to make it look better. Looking at the articles for all of the tornado outbreak articles for 2013, none had their own damage or reference columns, and most of the other 2012 articles didn't have Max Width columns, so that one might be able to be removed as well. Inks.LWC ( talk) 04:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Where did we get the >$150 million from? Inks.LWC ( talk) 05:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Late December 2012 North American storm complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Late December 2012 North American storm complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.kalb.com/story/20436006/tioga-unites-after-tornadoWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)