Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kraftlos ( Talk | Contrib) 13:20, 20 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Well Written

As far as I can tell, this article is well written. I don't see any mistakes on the page and the copy looks clean.

Factually accurate and verifiable

I was pleased to see that everything in this article is referenced using foot notes. Also a substantial portion of the content in this article references reliable third-party sources. Along with references notes are provided.

Broad in its coverage

The sections vary slightly with Anime and Manga Manual of Style, but every required section is present in the article. There are no omissions as far as I can tell.

Neutral

No POV issues.

Stable

It appears the bulk of the work has been performed by Arsonal over the last few months. There have been no major conflicts or edit wars to speak of.

Illustrated by images

The article is appropriately illustrated with images directly relevant to the commentary. All images are tagged with proper rationale.

Conclusion

This article appears to meet all Good Article criteria. Good job and keep up the good work!