![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
How long would it take for a large igneous province to cool?
Obviously the initial temperature, depth, and composition all play key roles.
"Individual lava flows may take tens to hundreds of years, depending on thickness. Keep in mind that perhaps 90% of the magma generated may remain deep within the crust as intrusions, which will keep the crust hot for a long time. Geodoc 05:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Should Northern Cordilleran volcanic province be listed on this page? Nothing there seems to suggest that it is a Large igneous province. -- Burntnickel 16:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
It's back. I rather doubt it should be here unless someone can point to publications that suggest there's some consensus (that I'm as yet unaware of) where this is considered a LIP. I think examples should be limited to cases where there's broad consensus in the scientific community of the feature's status as a LIP. Of course it doesn't help that LIPs are rather crudely defined. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.9.146.66 ( talk • contribs).
This article is really interesting, but it is difficult for a layman (like me) to follow. I feel the language could be made more accessible.
John W.
examples are the Deccan traps:end Cretaceous extinction event
Also, "Permian Emeishan Large Igneous Province" link on this page goes to "Mt Emri" or something. I was expecting to find that the Permian Emeishan LIP was related to the Siberian traps (or at least coincident in time).
Thanks for your time. John W.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.83.232.158 ( talk) 13:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC).
Hi. Is there a large igneous province in Western USA, surrounding Yellowstone, Long Valley, Valle Grande, La Garita, and Bruneau-Jarbidge? Thanks. A stroHur ricane 00 1( Talk+ Contribs+ Ubx) 21:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Apparently, the Steens in Oregon are related to the Yellow Stone hotspot via 16.5 million years of tectonic movement (Ellen Morris Bishop in book "In Search of Ancient Oregon", pg 131 mentions studies by Peter Hooper (of WSU) supporting the connection. Though, I guess a strip of activity is not a province meeting the LIP definition.
Hi, is the Cenozoic Volcanic field region in the NW USA identified by this Idaho State University map a LIP or is the Cenozoic period too long of a time period? http://geology.isu.edu/Digital_Geology_Idaho/Module9/BandRmapWlegend.jpg from: http://geology.isu.edu/Digital_Geology_Idaho/Module9/mod9.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.81.43 ( talk) 12:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
This page could very much use a map. That is not a good reason to include a map that corresponds poorly to the text in the article, and that also is almost entirely irrelevent to the article.
The deleted map depicts mainly; Shield, Platform, Orogen, Basin, and Extended Crust. None of these entities are even mentioned in the text, not even by a single word, nor are they wiki-linked within the article.
The distribution of LIP's shown on the deleted map would mislead the lay reader into thinking that there are just a half-dozen or so LIP's in the world. Many of the world's largest LIP's are simply not shown on the deleted map. (Even though they are mentioned or referenced in the article) Perhaps worse, the deleted map would sorely misinform the reader about the proportion of the earths surface that is covered by LIP's.
It is not a bad map - it is a good map badly used. CGX ( talk) 16:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an important topic & warrants attention from the wikigeology community. There was some very nice work already done on the article; I think the writing style was far smoother than I can contribute and the author knew the current literature. But the content left me with several questions/observations:
So as an amateur I’m doing some work on the article, but it will need a careful read by a trained geologist once I’m finished to assure accuracy. Anyone who wants to critique as I go along is welcome.
Skål - Williamborg ( Bill) 16:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Large igneous province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1988/1988_Rampino_Stothers_1.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
If and when the map is improved or replaced, it would be good to have the British/Irish part of the North Atlantic Igneous Province included. cheers Geopersona ( talk) 07:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Per this article, Hawaii is an LIP but is not in the map graphic. This is just my opinion, but the tallest mountain in the world, plus the long string of Hawaiian volcanic seamounts, and the most active volcanic area in the world, probably qualifies it as an LIP. The Deccan Traps are flood basalts that are caused by the onset of a mantle plume at the crust. Hawaii is also a mantle plume. Food for thought. Leitmotiv ( talk) 18:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
How long would it take for a large igneous province to cool?
Obviously the initial temperature, depth, and composition all play key roles.
"Individual lava flows may take tens to hundreds of years, depending on thickness. Keep in mind that perhaps 90% of the magma generated may remain deep within the crust as intrusions, which will keep the crust hot for a long time. Geodoc 05:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Should Northern Cordilleran volcanic province be listed on this page? Nothing there seems to suggest that it is a Large igneous province. -- Burntnickel 16:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
It's back. I rather doubt it should be here unless someone can point to publications that suggest there's some consensus (that I'm as yet unaware of) where this is considered a LIP. I think examples should be limited to cases where there's broad consensus in the scientific community of the feature's status as a LIP. Of course it doesn't help that LIPs are rather crudely defined. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.9.146.66 ( talk • contribs).
This article is really interesting, but it is difficult for a layman (like me) to follow. I feel the language could be made more accessible.
John W.
examples are the Deccan traps:end Cretaceous extinction event
Also, "Permian Emeishan Large Igneous Province" link on this page goes to "Mt Emri" or something. I was expecting to find that the Permian Emeishan LIP was related to the Siberian traps (or at least coincident in time).
Thanks for your time. John W.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.83.232.158 ( talk) 13:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC).
Hi. Is there a large igneous province in Western USA, surrounding Yellowstone, Long Valley, Valle Grande, La Garita, and Bruneau-Jarbidge? Thanks. A stroHur ricane 00 1( Talk+ Contribs+ Ubx) 21:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Apparently, the Steens in Oregon are related to the Yellow Stone hotspot via 16.5 million years of tectonic movement (Ellen Morris Bishop in book "In Search of Ancient Oregon", pg 131 mentions studies by Peter Hooper (of WSU) supporting the connection. Though, I guess a strip of activity is not a province meeting the LIP definition.
Hi, is the Cenozoic Volcanic field region in the NW USA identified by this Idaho State University map a LIP or is the Cenozoic period too long of a time period? http://geology.isu.edu/Digital_Geology_Idaho/Module9/BandRmapWlegend.jpg from: http://geology.isu.edu/Digital_Geology_Idaho/Module9/mod9.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.81.43 ( talk) 12:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
This page could very much use a map. That is not a good reason to include a map that corresponds poorly to the text in the article, and that also is almost entirely irrelevent to the article.
The deleted map depicts mainly; Shield, Platform, Orogen, Basin, and Extended Crust. None of these entities are even mentioned in the text, not even by a single word, nor are they wiki-linked within the article.
The distribution of LIP's shown on the deleted map would mislead the lay reader into thinking that there are just a half-dozen or so LIP's in the world. Many of the world's largest LIP's are simply not shown on the deleted map. (Even though they are mentioned or referenced in the article) Perhaps worse, the deleted map would sorely misinform the reader about the proportion of the earths surface that is covered by LIP's.
It is not a bad map - it is a good map badly used. CGX ( talk) 16:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an important topic & warrants attention from the wikigeology community. There was some very nice work already done on the article; I think the writing style was far smoother than I can contribute and the author knew the current literature. But the content left me with several questions/observations:
So as an amateur I’m doing some work on the article, but it will need a careful read by a trained geologist once I’m finished to assure accuracy. Anyone who wants to critique as I go along is welcome.
Skål - Williamborg ( Bill) 16:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Large igneous province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1988/1988_Rampino_Stothers_1.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
If and when the map is improved or replaced, it would be good to have the British/Irish part of the North Atlantic Igneous Province included. cheers Geopersona ( talk) 07:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Per this article, Hawaii is an LIP but is not in the map graphic. This is just my opinion, but the tallest mountain in the world, plus the long string of Hawaiian volcanic seamounts, and the most active volcanic area in the world, probably qualifies it as an LIP. The Deccan Traps are flood basalts that are caused by the onset of a mantle plume at the crust. Hawaii is also a mantle plume. Food for thought. Leitmotiv ( talk) 18:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)