This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Dynamical systems.

This page should be merged with Langevin equation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdengler ( talk • contribs) 18:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• I agree. Another point: What is "A molecular system in the real world is unlikely to be present in vacuum." supposed to mean? I would clarify it if I just had an idea what the editor wanted to say here. Seattle Jörg ( talk) 08:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC) reply

• Disagree. Langevin dynamics is more about computational simulation. "A molecular system in the real world is unlikely to be present in vacuum." is also talking about simulation where larger molecules are usually presented without solvent molecules. Wayoflights ( talk) 03:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Comment: 15 years on, this article is still a stub. Whoever it is in chemistry that uses this, they are not active on WP. 67.198.37.16 ( talk) 23:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) reply

this seems to be inconsistent with the article which claims gamma to be the viscosity-- 129.69.120.59 ( talk) 14:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC) reply

In the equation

${\displaystyle M{\ddot {X}}=-\nabla U(X)-\gamma M{\dot {X}}+{\sqrt {2M\gamma k_{B}T}}R(t)\,,}$

the left side is mass * acceleration (force), but the right side is confused. Where does the factor of M come from in

${\displaystyle \gamma M{\dot {X}}}$ ??

The units are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:598B:6F00:94E6:CED8:4B11:FFC2 ( talk) 20:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC) reply