![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
(Copied from
User talk:No such user)
Hi, I've received notification that you have removed the template I placed and added a source. The reason I placed the template was not about the groupings directly below the template, but the other stuff later on in the section such as "If it were not for the 40 km of coastline...." and "If Transnistria is included then..."
It sounds a bit too much like trivia to me. I thought that placing the template under the list of countries was the least obtrusive place for it. But did I use the wrong template?
AtHomeIn神戸 (
talk) 08:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
I think there is an original research in the definition of clusters to group the landlocked countries. MacKellar et al. (2000) in their paper " Economic Development Problems of Landlocked Countries", which is used as a source in the article, do not seem to define clusters in this way and the table in appendix seems to be lacking some landlocked countries and also includes countries with coastline. Also, the paper appears to be obsolete to be cited in the article.-- Kiril Simeonovski ( talk) 07:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
(Copied from
User talk:No such user)
Hi, I've received notification that you have removed the template I placed and added a source. The reason I placed the template was not about the groupings directly below the template, but the other stuff later on in the section such as "If it were not for the 40 km of coastline...." and "If Transnistria is included then..."
It sounds a bit too much like trivia to me. I thought that placing the template under the list of countries was the least obtrusive place for it. But did I use the wrong template?
AtHomeIn神戸 (
talk) 08:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
I think there is an original research in the definition of clusters to group the landlocked countries. MacKellar et al. (2000) in their paper " Economic Development Problems of Landlocked Countries", which is used as a source in the article, do not seem to define clusters in this way and the table in appendix seems to be lacking some landlocked countries and also includes countries with coastline. Also, the paper appears to be obsolete to be cited in the article.-- Kiril Simeonovski ( talk) 07:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)