![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article states that the real Lambert II died on June 19, 1054 and that the "Lambert II of Leuven" that died in 1062 must've actually been another Lambert. I have two complaints about that:
Here are a few of the sources that I've seen:
The aforementioned pages are not authoritative sources, but the various owners of those web sites are regarded — rightly, in my humble opinion — as genealogists of professional and expert caliber. In addition, there are more non-authoritative sources of equal repute. Armed with those sources, I'm prepared to "correct" this issue in the article. However, if someone will cite a truly authoritative source for the 1054 date, I'll accept it and move on with my life. Any takers? - JohnAlbertRigali ( talk) 07:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Counts of Leuven - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 05:21, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Counts of Louvain - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 22:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article states that the real Lambert II died on June 19, 1054 and that the "Lambert II of Leuven" that died in 1062 must've actually been another Lambert. I have two complaints about that:
Here are a few of the sources that I've seen:
The aforementioned pages are not authoritative sources, but the various owners of those web sites are regarded — rightly, in my humble opinion — as genealogists of professional and expert caliber. In addition, there are more non-authoritative sources of equal repute. Armed with those sources, I'm prepared to "correct" this issue in the article. However, if someone will cite a truly authoritative source for the 1054 date, I'll accept it and move on with my life. Any takers? - JohnAlbertRigali ( talk) 07:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Counts of Leuven - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 05:21, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Counts of Louvain - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 22:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)