This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmansi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 02:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Would it be appropriate to add a history section, going into the whole cheneosaur situation? Right now it's somewhat divided between several pages, and if they can't get their own page denoting historical usage, this seems like the best place to summarize it all together. Lusotitan 03:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, such a section should be standard anyway. By the way, seems you accidentally deleted the former sections on this talk page? FunkMonk ( talk) 09:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC) reply