![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
![]() | An email has been received at
VRTS concerning some or all of the text on this page, and can be read by users with a VRTS account.
However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the text. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published. For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT volunteer, the text will be deleted. |
|
I would like to note that none of the material used is copyrighted. I would also like to note that although some material has come off the national website I have been granted permission for its use from the organizations national secretary and public relations chair. I am currently in the process of editing the article to be read from a more neutral point of view. I do not know what the next step is please inform me. Monarca7 ( talk) 01:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
I have notified the National secretary of the organization of this. However, it is believed that tag was placed in error as I have been assured there is no copyright in place for the information. It may be that it pertain to the esthetics and layout of the site. I have also taken it upon myself to check the United States copyright office website it also does not appear there. Monarca7 ( talk) 03:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Well Monarca7, after you made the claim that other frats have copyrighted material awhile ago, I did search through many of them and found nothing. Passionless -Talk 22:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Slp1 I understand what you mean but you have been very helpful so far and you have actually given me some research that I did not previously know about. Also, as you can see I still need help clearing this up and as a member of a fraternity I would not want to cause somebody else this frustration. Passionless I am new to Wikipedia. Your search was probably inadequate as because, I was new, I used several other fraternity articles as a model this is why I thought it was acceptable. Can I ask in what manner did you conduct you search? I feel as if by questioning an edit or asking for an explanation upsets you if that is correct it is not my intention. I am just new to this so I ask. Thank you. Monarca7 ( talk) 00:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I just did the same and found 7. However, as I am new to the rules and do not necessarily agree with them it is not my place tag them as copyrighted. However, when looking at an org open their national site and go to history or type a phrase into Google. Monarca7 ( talk) 00:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I am sorry but once I found them I deleted them and since I picked them at random I don't remember the organizations. Thank you for providing a reference to a page that showed what is acceptable and for working with me here. I am not an aspiring editor it just this wiki thing becomes an obsession quick. I just know when someone is looking up information about an org they are looking for a lot of stuff. When I searched wiki for a lot of information on organization it was unfortunately very limited please let me know if you have more suggestions and thank you for the help so far. Now I got to get back to real life. Monarca7 ( talk) 01:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
This article has some problems with images, 1 being the massive photo of the group of men, and the other is the sheer number of photos is overwhelming. Please see this, as it backs me up with both issues. If you-Monarca- could remove some photos so that I do not have to choose which ones go, that would be appreciated. And you were saying before about the photo needing to be big so people can see each person in the photo, well there are a huge number of photos which are massive but kept as a thumbnail so as to no disturb the text. Some examples would be the first two photos on the NHL page or the second painting-Titan's goblet- on Thomas Cole's page. Passionless -Talk 06:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lambda Sigma Upsilon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
![]() | An email has been received at
VRTS concerning some or all of the text on this page, and can be read by users with a VRTS account.
However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the text. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published. For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT volunteer, the text will be deleted. |
|
I would like to note that none of the material used is copyrighted. I would also like to note that although some material has come off the national website I have been granted permission for its use from the organizations national secretary and public relations chair. I am currently in the process of editing the article to be read from a more neutral point of view. I do not know what the next step is please inform me. Monarca7 ( talk) 01:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
I have notified the National secretary of the organization of this. However, it is believed that tag was placed in error as I have been assured there is no copyright in place for the information. It may be that it pertain to the esthetics and layout of the site. I have also taken it upon myself to check the United States copyright office website it also does not appear there. Monarca7 ( talk) 03:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Well Monarca7, after you made the claim that other frats have copyrighted material awhile ago, I did search through many of them and found nothing. Passionless -Talk 22:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Slp1 I understand what you mean but you have been very helpful so far and you have actually given me some research that I did not previously know about. Also, as you can see I still need help clearing this up and as a member of a fraternity I would not want to cause somebody else this frustration. Passionless I am new to Wikipedia. Your search was probably inadequate as because, I was new, I used several other fraternity articles as a model this is why I thought it was acceptable. Can I ask in what manner did you conduct you search? I feel as if by questioning an edit or asking for an explanation upsets you if that is correct it is not my intention. I am just new to this so I ask. Thank you. Monarca7 ( talk) 00:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I just did the same and found 7. However, as I am new to the rules and do not necessarily agree with them it is not my place tag them as copyrighted. However, when looking at an org open their national site and go to history or type a phrase into Google. Monarca7 ( talk) 00:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I am sorry but once I found them I deleted them and since I picked them at random I don't remember the organizations. Thank you for providing a reference to a page that showed what is acceptable and for working with me here. I am not an aspiring editor it just this wiki thing becomes an obsession quick. I just know when someone is looking up information about an org they are looking for a lot of stuff. When I searched wiki for a lot of information on organization it was unfortunately very limited please let me know if you have more suggestions and thank you for the help so far. Now I got to get back to real life. Monarca7 ( talk) 01:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
This article has some problems with images, 1 being the massive photo of the group of men, and the other is the sheer number of photos is overwhelming. Please see this, as it backs me up with both issues. If you-Monarca- could remove some photos so that I do not have to choose which ones go, that would be appreciated. And you were saying before about the photo needing to be big so people can see each person in the photo, well there are a huge number of photos which are massive but kept as a thumbnail so as to no disturb the text. Some examples would be the first two photos on the NHL page or the second painting-Titan's goblet- on Thomas Cole's page. Passionless -Talk 06:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lambda Sigma Upsilon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)