Lalatapa is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
Armenia and
Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
the article hasn't any neutral sources on capture of Lalatapa by Azeri forces. and the importance of lalatapa is also questionable.
Lkahd (
talk)
12:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
please do not delete tags without further discussions here at talk. "Gulf Times" page is not found, and AFP official site writes only that "Azerbaijan's army claimed to have snatched control of several strategic locations inside Armenian-controlled territory".
[1]Lkahd (
talk)
19:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
I can still access that Gulf Times page. As for AFP, that statement doesn't exclude the recapture Lalatapa. It could be among those strategic locations. Thus
Stratfor's statement also confirms what Gulf Times wrote, until proven otherwise.
Brandmeistertalk21:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Lkahd, I cited an article from L'Express for a reason. It says: "Un journaliste de l'AFP présent sur la colline de Lala-Tepe a toutefois pu constater que cette position était bien passée sous le contrôle des forces azerbaïdjanaises" which means "An AFP reporter who was present on the Lala-Tepe hill was nevertheless able to note that this position has been decisively placed under the control of Azerbaijani forces". Why is there a need in this the "neutrality" tag and the mention of "Hadrut region" when Armenian forces clearly ceded their position?
Parishan (
talk)
15:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Merger proposal
I propose that
Lalatapa be merged into
2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes. The Lalatapa has not enough notability and the only reliable source is related to the 2016 clashes. Most of the text is not confirmed by any reliable sources. The article's size is also too litle as no relable sources to cite.
Lkahd (
talk)
10:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Neutral Normally, such geographic features deserve standalone articles, but in this case I found very little info. Perhaps there are more offline sources about it, such as undigitized paper publications.
Brandmeistertalk17:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Lalatapa is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to
Armenia and
Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the
project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
the article hasn't any neutral sources on capture of Lalatapa by Azeri forces. and the importance of lalatapa is also questionable.
Lkahd (
talk)
12:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
please do not delete tags without further discussions here at talk. "Gulf Times" page is not found, and AFP official site writes only that "Azerbaijan's army claimed to have snatched control of several strategic locations inside Armenian-controlled territory".
[1]Lkahd (
talk)
19:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
I can still access that Gulf Times page. As for AFP, that statement doesn't exclude the recapture Lalatapa. It could be among those strategic locations. Thus
Stratfor's statement also confirms what Gulf Times wrote, until proven otherwise.
Brandmeistertalk21:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Lkahd, I cited an article from L'Express for a reason. It says: "Un journaliste de l'AFP présent sur la colline de Lala-Tepe a toutefois pu constater que cette position était bien passée sous le contrôle des forces azerbaïdjanaises" which means "An AFP reporter who was present on the Lala-Tepe hill was nevertheless able to note that this position has been decisively placed under the control of Azerbaijani forces". Why is there a need in this the "neutrality" tag and the mention of "Hadrut region" when Armenian forces clearly ceded their position?
Parishan (
talk)
15:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Merger proposal
I propose that
Lalatapa be merged into
2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes. The Lalatapa has not enough notability and the only reliable source is related to the 2016 clashes. Most of the text is not confirmed by any reliable sources. The article's size is also too litle as no relable sources to cite.
Lkahd (
talk)
10:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Neutral Normally, such geographic features deserve standalone articles, but in this case I found very little info. Perhaps there are more offline sources about it, such as undigitized paper publications.
Brandmeistertalk17:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)reply