![]() | Laguna del Maule (volcano) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 6, 2021. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
A little technical, but looks very comprehensive and well written to a non-expert. I took the liberty of removing the unreviewed template after doing some copyedits and reading through the whole article. I don't know the project criteria, but left to my own judgement I would rate it at least B-class. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The abundance of rhyolites at Laguna del Maule distinguishes this volcanic center from more southerly volcanic complexes in Chile., I agree that "frequency" is probably not the right word. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The following phrase:
Is with most likehood false. First the source is old. In 1976 very little was known about Chilean volcanoes and it seem to contradict the following sourced statement of the Puyehue-Cordón Caulle article:
Mamayuco ( talk) 18:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
"Dacite and rhyolite are also found, (Laguna del Maule is the only known place in Chile where basalt-andesite-dacite-rhyolite are found together),[4] although the presence of all four rocks was later demonstrated at Puyehue-Cordón Caulle"
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tisquesusa ( talk · contribs) 03:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Excellent complete article, definitely GA
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laguna del Maule (volcano). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
So, I've begun to do some pre-FAC prep work as I plan to send this article there once Coropuna has passed. One first question that comes is how the list of caldera-forming eruptions in "Eruption history" is best formatted; as is it's a long snake like sentence. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Jo-Jo, see WP:BADITALICS. Proper nouns in non-English language are not italicized. But this articles uses the Language template on Spanish words, which automatically italicizes them. I'm not sure why use the language template when translations aren't given. The options are to just remove the language templates, or to add the paramter |italic= no on proper nouns. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
|italic=no
on all these items.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk)
09:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Goes from volcanic activity, to name, back to volcanic activity ... can the sentences be rearranged? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Why, "it has been suggested"? Is it or isn't it? "Has been suggested" seems to suggest attribution or a source is needed as to why this is unclear. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Why the citation after contains? Placement is odd ... is it citing the surface area? Is it citing "contains" (which seems to be covered by the next citation)? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Basically, the section that begins with Among the various structures in the volcanic field, Domo del Maule lava dome is
currently only discusses the systems mentioned in
its source. I was wondering if other parts of the system should be described.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk)
12:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Three major
caldera-forming eruptions took place in the volcanic field during pre-
last glacial times, 1.5 million, 990,000–950,000, and 336,000 years ago.
Three major caldera-forming eruptions took place between 336,000 and 1.5 million years ago, before the Last Glacial Period.
Postglacial volcanic activity has included eruptions with simultaneous explosive and effusive components and eruptions where only one component was present.
Postglacial volcanic activity has included eruptions with simultaneous explosive and effusive components, as well as eruptions with only one component.
The field gets its name from the lake which is also the source of the Maule river.
The Laguna del Maule volcanic field is centred around 36.1°S 70.5°W, straddling the Chilean-Argentine frontier with most of the complex on the Chilean side.
The Laguna del Maule volcanic field straddles the Chilean–Argentine frontier,(put coords footnote here) with most of the complex on the Chilean side.
The locality belongs to the
Maule Region, of
Talca province in the Andes mountain range, close to the confluence of the
Maule and
Campanario rivers in the Maule's valley.
The locality is in the Maule Region of the Talca province in the Andes mountain range; it is close to the confluence of the Maule and Campanario rivers in the Maule valley.
The subduction of the Nazca plate beneath the South America plate has formed a volcanic arc about 4,000 kilometres (2,500 mi) long, which is subdivided into several segments distinguished by varying angles of subduction of the Nazca plate.
Benches and beach bars developed on the lake ...
Benches and beach bars developed on the lake,[22] which has left a shoreline around Laguna del Maule.[25] Additionally, tephra fallout has impacted the lake through the Holocene and affected life in the lake waters.[26]
with length that varies from 6 kilometres (3.7 mi)[29] to 5 kilometres (3.1 mi),
Slopes around Laguna del Maule are covered by colluvium including talus slopes.[20],
Subduction of the eastern part of Nazca plate beneath the western margin of the
South America Plate occurs at a rate of about 74 ± 2 millimetres per year (2.913 ± 0.079 in/year); this process is responsible for events such as the
1960 Valdivia earthquake and the
2010 Chile earthquake. This subduction process is responsible for the growth of the
Chilean Andes and the volcanic and geothermal manifestations therein, including Laguna del Maule which formed 25 kilometres (16 mi) behind the volcanic arc.
Subduction of the eastern part of Nazca plate beneath the western margin of the South America Plate occurs at a rate of about 74 ± 2 millimetres per year (2.913 ± 0.079 in/year). This subduction process is responsible for growth of the Chilean Andes, and volcanic and geothermal manifestations such as the 1960 Valdivia earthquake and the 2010 Chile earthquake, as well as Laguna del Maule, which formed 25 kilometres (16 mi) behind the volcanic arc.
Probably due to increased convergence rates of the Nazca and South America plates for the past 28 million years, a phase of strong volcanic activity commenced in the Andes 25 million years ago.
Cola del Zoro Formation
Faults lie within the volcanic field, such as the Troncoso Fault in its southwestern sector, which is alternatively described as a
strike-slip or as a
normal fault and which separates distinct regimes of tectonic and volcanic activity within the Laguna del Maule volcanic field; and various north-south cutting faults are found within the Campanario Formation.
Faults such as the Troncoso Fault lie within the southwestern sector of the volcanic field. Troncoso is alternatively described as a strike-slip or as a normal fault; it separates distinct regimes of tectonic and volcanic activity within the Laguna del Maule volcanic field. Other north–south cutting faults are found within the Campanario Formation.
Laguna del Maule has erupted andesite, basaltic andesite,[12] basalt,[39] dacite,[2] rhyodacite and rhyolite,[39] the andesites and basaltic andesites having medium K contents[48] and in the Loma de Los Espejos rocks a SiO2 content of 75.6–76.7% per weight has been noted.
Several silicic rocks are known from the Quaternary.
The total volume of volcanic rocks that are part of the Laguna del Maule volcanic field is over 350 cubic kilometres (84 cu mi), of which about 40 cubic kilometres (9.6 cu mi) were emplaced postglacially.
Of the more than 350 cubic kilometres (84 cu mi) of volcanic rock in the Laguna del Maule field, about 40 cubic kilometres (9.6 cu mi) were emplaced postglacially.
The mostly postglacial Lake unit includes glassy rhyolite ...
The Lake unit is mostly postglacial and includes glassy rhyolite ...
The postglacial rocks have very similar element compositions.--> More direct,
The postglacial rocks are composed of similar elements.SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Precipitation related to cold fronts falls during autumn and winter,, spell out months of autumn and winter. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Maximum what? with a maximum occurring between 25,600 ± 1,200 and 23,300 ± 600 years ago
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
22:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
During this time a 80 kilometres wide ice cap covered the volcano and the surrounding valleys.
Jo-Jo, I see a lot of work needed from Eruptive history on; if you are able to work through it again (noting issues like those above), and then message me on my user talk, I will review those two sections after you've been through. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Date | Name | Location | Notes and Sources |
---|---|---|---|
What if you do a table? Because I am not looking forward to reading through all these numbers. Let me know what you decide, and I will continue with this section. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
References
Done with this section (Jo-Jo, I hope you realize you can revert anything I do). SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
The alt text for the infobox image should not just repeat the image caption information; alt texts are missing for the other images. See MOS:ALT for advice. ~ RLO1729 💬 00:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Jo-Jo, in those cases when the caption is adequate for alt text, you can say, “See caption”. On dup links, it os important to check for them, and eliminate dupes where appropriate, but also to remember that guidelines are guidelines (Not policy), our first service is to our readers, and occasionally in very technical articles, it can be necessary or useful to repeat links. I do not believe any Coord would disagree that some leeway and discretion is allowed on very technical topics. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Pardon my ignorance while I lay out lots of things I don't understand :) I like that the table eliminates a whole lot of number-filled text. But it presents things that show my ignorance of the topic (which I think would be typical for layreaders), and that I only figure out after studying it for a long time.
I'll keep going after decision is made on this. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
I do not see any rationale for adding a (unsourced and poorly written) pronunciation of the name on the page. JoJo Eumerus mobile ( main talk) 21:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
The reason is that the pronunciation is not obvious for anglophones. I have responded more fully on your talk page. Awien ( talk) 23:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Copying here to centralise discussion:
Indicating the pronunciation is not a random parenthetical. It is the addition of pertinent information. But do feel free to supplement it with the IPA if you wish. Cheers! Awien (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Instead of merely removing useful information, why don't you fix the wording to your satisfaction? Improve, don't delete. Also, uncontroversial common-knowledge facts don't need to be referenced, and there's nothing controversial about this pronunciation, which simply might not be obvious to Anglophones.
Please self-revert.
Awien (talk) 22:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
P.S. A hispanophone says the name in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRdyHM_cfZs How about this, since "rhymes with" is specifically permitted: Pron. MAU (rhymes with "cow") le (rhymes with "lay").
Awien (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
I think Anglophones who don't know Spanish will not have a too distorted impression on the actual Spanish ponunciation. First language Anglophones are accostumed to Spanish, including placenames in the US, familiar words like amigo as well as hearing it. Spanish and English are languages with a long history of knowing and influencing each other, as well as having much common heritage (e.g. Latin, Latin alphabet) What I am saying is that inclusion pronunciuation would be more critical if Spanish was one of such "rare" languages of which a normal Anglophone would have no clue on how the words may sound. Mamayuco ( talk) 22:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi @ Jo-Jo Eumerus, I noticed on this article that the shortened footnotes are not using templates, and I think it would aid in navigation if I moved them to the {{ sfn}} templates. Would that be okay? Also, I noticed that some journal cites are inline, when they should be moved to bib. Is it okay if I make these changes? BhamBoi ( talk) 21:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Laguna del Maule (volcano) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 6, 2021. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
A little technical, but looks very comprehensive and well written to a non-expert. I took the liberty of removing the unreviewed template after doing some copyedits and reading through the whole article. I don't know the project criteria, but left to my own judgement I would rate it at least B-class. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:29, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
The abundance of rhyolites at Laguna del Maule distinguishes this volcanic center from more southerly volcanic complexes in Chile., I agree that "frequency" is probably not the right word. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The following phrase:
Is with most likehood false. First the source is old. In 1976 very little was known about Chilean volcanoes and it seem to contradict the following sourced statement of the Puyehue-Cordón Caulle article:
Mamayuco ( talk) 18:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
"Dacite and rhyolite are also found, (Laguna del Maule is the only known place in Chile where basalt-andesite-dacite-rhyolite are found together),[4] although the presence of all four rocks was later demonstrated at Puyehue-Cordón Caulle"
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Tisquesusa ( talk · contribs) 03:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Excellent complete article, definitely GA
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laguna del Maule (volcano). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
So, I've begun to do some pre-FAC prep work as I plan to send this article there once Coropuna has passed. One first question that comes is how the list of caldera-forming eruptions in "Eruption history" is best formatted; as is it's a long snake like sentence. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 20:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Jo-Jo, see WP:BADITALICS. Proper nouns in non-English language are not italicized. But this articles uses the Language template on Spanish words, which automatically italicizes them. I'm not sure why use the language template when translations aren't given. The options are to just remove the language templates, or to add the paramter |italic= no on proper nouns. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
|italic=no
on all these items.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk)
09:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Goes from volcanic activity, to name, back to volcanic activity ... can the sentences be rearranged? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Why, "it has been suggested"? Is it or isn't it? "Has been suggested" seems to suggest attribution or a source is needed as to why this is unclear. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Why the citation after contains? Placement is odd ... is it citing the surface area? Is it citing "contains" (which seems to be covered by the next citation)? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Basically, the section that begins with Among the various structures in the volcanic field, Domo del Maule lava dome is
currently only discusses the systems mentioned in
its source. I was wondering if other parts of the system should be described.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk)
12:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Three major
caldera-forming eruptions took place in the volcanic field during pre-
last glacial times, 1.5 million, 990,000–950,000, and 336,000 years ago.
Three major caldera-forming eruptions took place between 336,000 and 1.5 million years ago, before the Last Glacial Period.
Postglacial volcanic activity has included eruptions with simultaneous explosive and effusive components and eruptions where only one component was present.
Postglacial volcanic activity has included eruptions with simultaneous explosive and effusive components, as well as eruptions with only one component.
The field gets its name from the lake which is also the source of the Maule river.
The Laguna del Maule volcanic field is centred around 36.1°S 70.5°W, straddling the Chilean-Argentine frontier with most of the complex on the Chilean side.
The Laguna del Maule volcanic field straddles the Chilean–Argentine frontier,(put coords footnote here) with most of the complex on the Chilean side.
The locality belongs to the
Maule Region, of
Talca province in the Andes mountain range, close to the confluence of the
Maule and
Campanario rivers in the Maule's valley.
The locality is in the Maule Region of the Talca province in the Andes mountain range; it is close to the confluence of the Maule and Campanario rivers in the Maule valley.
The subduction of the Nazca plate beneath the South America plate has formed a volcanic arc about 4,000 kilometres (2,500 mi) long, which is subdivided into several segments distinguished by varying angles of subduction of the Nazca plate.
Benches and beach bars developed on the lake ...
Benches and beach bars developed on the lake,[22] which has left a shoreline around Laguna del Maule.[25] Additionally, tephra fallout has impacted the lake through the Holocene and affected life in the lake waters.[26]
with length that varies from 6 kilometres (3.7 mi)[29] to 5 kilometres (3.1 mi),
Slopes around Laguna del Maule are covered by colluvium including talus slopes.[20],
Subduction of the eastern part of Nazca plate beneath the western margin of the
South America Plate occurs at a rate of about 74 ± 2 millimetres per year (2.913 ± 0.079 in/year); this process is responsible for events such as the
1960 Valdivia earthquake and the
2010 Chile earthquake. This subduction process is responsible for the growth of the
Chilean Andes and the volcanic and geothermal manifestations therein, including Laguna del Maule which formed 25 kilometres (16 mi) behind the volcanic arc.
Subduction of the eastern part of Nazca plate beneath the western margin of the South America Plate occurs at a rate of about 74 ± 2 millimetres per year (2.913 ± 0.079 in/year). This subduction process is responsible for growth of the Chilean Andes, and volcanic and geothermal manifestations such as the 1960 Valdivia earthquake and the 2010 Chile earthquake, as well as Laguna del Maule, which formed 25 kilometres (16 mi) behind the volcanic arc.
Probably due to increased convergence rates of the Nazca and South America plates for the past 28 million years, a phase of strong volcanic activity commenced in the Andes 25 million years ago.
Cola del Zoro Formation
Faults lie within the volcanic field, such as the Troncoso Fault in its southwestern sector, which is alternatively described as a
strike-slip or as a
normal fault and which separates distinct regimes of tectonic and volcanic activity within the Laguna del Maule volcanic field; and various north-south cutting faults are found within the Campanario Formation.
Faults such as the Troncoso Fault lie within the southwestern sector of the volcanic field. Troncoso is alternatively described as a strike-slip or as a normal fault; it separates distinct regimes of tectonic and volcanic activity within the Laguna del Maule volcanic field. Other north–south cutting faults are found within the Campanario Formation.
Laguna del Maule has erupted andesite, basaltic andesite,[12] basalt,[39] dacite,[2] rhyodacite and rhyolite,[39] the andesites and basaltic andesites having medium K contents[48] and in the Loma de Los Espejos rocks a SiO2 content of 75.6–76.7% per weight has been noted.
Several silicic rocks are known from the Quaternary.
The total volume of volcanic rocks that are part of the Laguna del Maule volcanic field is over 350 cubic kilometres (84 cu mi), of which about 40 cubic kilometres (9.6 cu mi) were emplaced postglacially.
Of the more than 350 cubic kilometres (84 cu mi) of volcanic rock in the Laguna del Maule field, about 40 cubic kilometres (9.6 cu mi) were emplaced postglacially.
The mostly postglacial Lake unit includes glassy rhyolite ...
The Lake unit is mostly postglacial and includes glassy rhyolite ...
The postglacial rocks have very similar element compositions.--> More direct,
The postglacial rocks are composed of similar elements.SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Precipitation related to cold fronts falls during autumn and winter,, spell out months of autumn and winter. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Maximum what? with a maximum occurring between 25,600 ± 1,200 and 23,300 ± 600 years ago
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
22:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
During this time a 80 kilometres wide ice cap covered the volcano and the surrounding valleys.
Jo-Jo, I see a lot of work needed from Eruptive history on; if you are able to work through it again (noting issues like those above), and then message me on my user talk, I will review those two sections after you've been through. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Date | Name | Location | Notes and Sources |
---|---|---|---|
What if you do a table? Because I am not looking forward to reading through all these numbers. Let me know what you decide, and I will continue with this section. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
References
Done with this section (Jo-Jo, I hope you realize you can revert anything I do). SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
The alt text for the infobox image should not just repeat the image caption information; alt texts are missing for the other images. See MOS:ALT for advice. ~ RLO1729 💬 00:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Jo-Jo, in those cases when the caption is adequate for alt text, you can say, “See caption”. On dup links, it os important to check for them, and eliminate dupes where appropriate, but also to remember that guidelines are guidelines (Not policy), our first service is to our readers, and occasionally in very technical articles, it can be necessary or useful to repeat links. I do not believe any Coord would disagree that some leeway and discretion is allowed on very technical topics. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Pardon my ignorance while I lay out lots of things I don't understand :) I like that the table eliminates a whole lot of number-filled text. But it presents things that show my ignorance of the topic (which I think would be typical for layreaders), and that I only figure out after studying it for a long time.
I'll keep going after decision is made on this. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 17:16, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
I do not see any rationale for adding a (unsourced and poorly written) pronunciation of the name on the page. JoJo Eumerus mobile ( main talk) 21:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
The reason is that the pronunciation is not obvious for anglophones. I have responded more fully on your talk page. Awien ( talk) 23:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Copying here to centralise discussion:
Indicating the pronunciation is not a random parenthetical. It is the addition of pertinent information. But do feel free to supplement it with the IPA if you wish. Cheers! Awien (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Instead of merely removing useful information, why don't you fix the wording to your satisfaction? Improve, don't delete. Also, uncontroversial common-knowledge facts don't need to be referenced, and there's nothing controversial about this pronunciation, which simply might not be obvious to Anglophones.
Please self-revert.
Awien (talk) 22:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
P.S. A hispanophone says the name in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRdyHM_cfZs How about this, since "rhymes with" is specifically permitted: Pron. MAU (rhymes with "cow") le (rhymes with "lay").
Awien (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
I think Anglophones who don't know Spanish will not have a too distorted impression on the actual Spanish ponunciation. First language Anglophones are accostumed to Spanish, including placenames in the US, familiar words like amigo as well as hearing it. Spanish and English are languages with a long history of knowing and influencing each other, as well as having much common heritage (e.g. Latin, Latin alphabet) What I am saying is that inclusion pronunciuation would be more critical if Spanish was one of such "rare" languages of which a normal Anglophone would have no clue on how the words may sound. Mamayuco ( talk) 22:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi @ Jo-Jo Eumerus, I noticed on this article that the shortened footnotes are not using templates, and I think it would aid in navigation if I moved them to the {{ sfn}} templates. Would that be okay? Also, I noticed that some journal cites are inline, when they should be moved to bib. Is it okay if I make these changes? BhamBoi ( talk) 21:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)