This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Shouldn't that be "AX Microscopii" (using the genitive plural of the constellation's name)?

According to luminosity

When not qualified, luminosity means bolometric luminosity

but the value 0.028 is obviously derived from the absolute visual magnitude, and is therefore not bolometric. Qemist ( talk) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Since HIP 12961 has a mass of 0.63 solar masses, a radius 0.68 ± 0.03 of the Sun, an absolute magnitude of +7.8 and is of spectral type M0, then it's obviously a more powerful star than Lacaille 8760. CrackDragon ( talk) 09:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC) reply