![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I hope the change I have made to the lead makes sense. I didn't think the previous second para version helped very much, especially the sandwich ref (!). I am hoping to add a couple of sections on "legislation" (generally) and "reception" (e.g. visual impairment, illiteracy, print size and language) soon as well as digging out some much-needed citations (which I should be able to find, as this is my specialist field). Tony Holkham ( talk) 02:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
This article needs a lot of work. Some citations are simply links to commercial sites. What do others think? Tony Holkham ( talk) 12:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
The recent revision of this is excellent. Thank you. I believe that the listed ASTM International technical standards were legitimate and should be reconsidered for this article. They prompt readers to look into the technical aspects of labels, if they wish. Rlsheehan ( talk) 20:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I hope the change I have made to the lead makes sense. I didn't think the previous second para version helped very much, especially the sandwich ref (!). I am hoping to add a couple of sections on "legislation" (generally) and "reception" (e.g. visual impairment, illiteracy, print size and language) soon as well as digging out some much-needed citations (which I should be able to find, as this is my specialist field). Tony Holkham ( talk) 02:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
This article needs a lot of work. Some citations are simply links to commercial sites. What do others think? Tony Holkham ( talk) 12:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
The recent revision of this is excellent. Thank you. I believe that the listed ASTM International technical standards were legitimate and should be reconsidered for this article. They prompt readers to look into the technical aspects of labels, if they wish. Rlsheehan ( talk) 20:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)