This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per lack of opposition.
SSTflyer 01:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Agree that the number should be Roman. Contemporary sources used it (eg the Jane's cited in article) and so does the cited, fairly authoritative Grey and Thetford book. Whether it is G.I (Jane's) or G I (G&T) is a minor point, so long as we have redirects.
TSRL (
talk) 17:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The convention on almost all modern references is to use the dot, as it is for most of the wiki pages for German aircraft of the era. There are a few occasions where it is helpful to distinguish between the German military's designation and company designation systems.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per lack of opposition.
SSTflyer 01:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Agree that the number should be Roman. Contemporary sources used it (eg the Jane's cited in article) and so does the cited, fairly authoritative Grey and Thetford book. Whether it is G.I (Jane's) or G I (G&T) is a minor point, so long as we have redirects.
TSRL (
talk) 17:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The convention on almost all modern references is to use the dot, as it is for most of the wiki pages for German aircraft of the era. There are a few occasions where it is helpful to distinguish between the German military's designation and company designation systems.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.