This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure what was meant by: "considering a key of representation of the guilds in the Rat of the city"
Perhaps that the means of selection of a new burgomaster was important to the representation of the guilds in the Rat?
PS: Sorry, I forgot I was not logged in. That last change to the article was by me.
@ Hroberth Dunbar: After resolving your citation problem, I noticed that the bottom area was in a mess, before you arrived. References, malformed notes and notes section, and now the addition of inline citations, all in a jumble! Anyway, I have reworked the entire area.
Now, if you wish to add additional citations, all will go smoothly. I also added a section header for History, but please revise as you see fit. I have added this page to my watchlist, so if edits are made, I can have a look.
If you decide to work here, at some point I would like to reformat the presentation of "Cities under Lubeck law" which offends my eyes, in its current form, ie as a very looong list!
Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 22:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Tribe of Tiger: Thanks for your effort, but unfortunately the content of this article is so unbelievably flawed, that I have a ton of work to put it right. I hope your efforts don't go to waste. Really, at least 90% needs to be deleted, is totally false or half-truths. I fixed the falsehood that there was no 'transcription' available until the 16th century (when i think a printed book was meant?). The guild quote is totally wrong (guild members were not allowed in the Lübeck Rat, I think what was meant may have been that the Rat grew out of earlier merchant guilds, but this is just speculation). Its hard to find something thats correct and at the same time there are basics which are omitted :( The list of cities is by no means comprehensive, there are over 100. A map showing the cities which acquire Lübeck law would be nice and more effective than the clunky list. As I am very busy with my studies I don't have time to fix the article in one fell swoop, but would like to little by little. I have no shortage of sources. I appreciate your help and enthusiasm. Hroberth Dunbar
Just a quick sidenote (I'll reply to the rest of your message as soon as I have more time): The tildes you inserted there are small tildes, which is likely why the software doesn't parse them. Depending on your keyboard layout, you may have to use a special key combination to get regular tildes. Another option would be to copy paste them or use the Charinsert extension which you can find at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets - it gives you the possibility to directly insert your signature. Pinging might be easiest to explain with an example: Typing {{re|Blablubbs}} renders as @ Blablubbs: and notifies me that someone mentioned me. Best, — Blablubbs ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
hi Tribe of the Tiger, thanks for the help with the Handschriftencensus article and for the congrats. I am presently having difficulties with a a citation for an edit in the article: /info/en/?search=L%C3%BCbeck_law The earliest Latin manuscript transmitting the Lubeck Law dates to 1226, the oldest Middle Low German manuscript to 1270. The earliest reference to a Lübeck Law manuscript is attributed to 1188. The Lübeck Law is influenced by the merchants from Westphalia who settled Lübeck as well as by the Holstein land law and the Schleswig Law.
Buchhester, Dörthe & Mario, Müller (2014) [1st pub. 2014]. "Lübisches Recht". In Achnitz, Wolfgang (ed.). Deutsches Literatur Lexikon des Mittelalters, Band 6 das wissensvermittelnde Literatur bis zum Ausgang des 14. Jahrhunderts (in German). Walter de Gruyter Verlag. pp. 508–516. ISBN 978-3-598-24996-9.
Somehow I can't get it to make a footnote. Could you please help? Its probably child's play for you. There is so much that is false in this article, that 95% of it should be deleted. I am shocked that there is only 1 reference, even that reference (Ebel) does not accurately reflect the source. Since I have been concentrating on the Lübeck Law in my studies for the last year I could try to improve the article. Thanks, Hroberth Dunbar ( talk · contribs)
@ Tribe of Tiger:Thanks for the upload of the manuscript image, inspires me to slowly improve/ correct the article. Also, the rearranging of the introductory section is great. I am confused about signing pings with the 4 tildes, for instance, i don't see where others have done it in this thread. Do the tildes get automatically deleted once the ping has been responded to? I just noticed one can insert the tildes at the bottom here. Did it work this time? Hroberth Dunbar Hroberth Dunbar ( talk) 15:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure what was meant by: "considering a key of representation of the guilds in the Rat of the city"
Perhaps that the means of selection of a new burgomaster was important to the representation of the guilds in the Rat?
PS: Sorry, I forgot I was not logged in. That last change to the article was by me.
@ Hroberth Dunbar: After resolving your citation problem, I noticed that the bottom area was in a mess, before you arrived. References, malformed notes and notes section, and now the addition of inline citations, all in a jumble! Anyway, I have reworked the entire area.
Now, if you wish to add additional citations, all will go smoothly. I also added a section header for History, but please revise as you see fit. I have added this page to my watchlist, so if edits are made, I can have a look.
If you decide to work here, at some point I would like to reformat the presentation of "Cities under Lubeck law" which offends my eyes, in its current form, ie as a very looong list!
Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 22:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
@ Tribe of Tiger: Thanks for your effort, but unfortunately the content of this article is so unbelievably flawed, that I have a ton of work to put it right. I hope your efforts don't go to waste. Really, at least 90% needs to be deleted, is totally false or half-truths. I fixed the falsehood that there was no 'transcription' available until the 16th century (when i think a printed book was meant?). The guild quote is totally wrong (guild members were not allowed in the Lübeck Rat, I think what was meant may have been that the Rat grew out of earlier merchant guilds, but this is just speculation). Its hard to find something thats correct and at the same time there are basics which are omitted :( The list of cities is by no means comprehensive, there are over 100. A map showing the cities which acquire Lübeck law would be nice and more effective than the clunky list. As I am very busy with my studies I don't have time to fix the article in one fell swoop, but would like to little by little. I have no shortage of sources. I appreciate your help and enthusiasm. Hroberth Dunbar
Just a quick sidenote (I'll reply to the rest of your message as soon as I have more time): The tildes you inserted there are small tildes, which is likely why the software doesn't parse them. Depending on your keyboard layout, you may have to use a special key combination to get regular tildes. Another option would be to copy paste them or use the Charinsert extension which you can find at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets - it gives you the possibility to directly insert your signature. Pinging might be easiest to explain with an example: Typing {{re|Blablubbs}} renders as @ Blablubbs: and notifies me that someone mentioned me. Best, — Blablubbs ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
hi Tribe of the Tiger, thanks for the help with the Handschriftencensus article and for the congrats. I am presently having difficulties with a a citation for an edit in the article: /info/en/?search=L%C3%BCbeck_law The earliest Latin manuscript transmitting the Lubeck Law dates to 1226, the oldest Middle Low German manuscript to 1270. The earliest reference to a Lübeck Law manuscript is attributed to 1188. The Lübeck Law is influenced by the merchants from Westphalia who settled Lübeck as well as by the Holstein land law and the Schleswig Law.
Buchhester, Dörthe & Mario, Müller (2014) [1st pub. 2014]. "Lübisches Recht". In Achnitz, Wolfgang (ed.). Deutsches Literatur Lexikon des Mittelalters, Band 6 das wissensvermittelnde Literatur bis zum Ausgang des 14. Jahrhunderts (in German). Walter de Gruyter Verlag. pp. 508–516. ISBN 978-3-598-24996-9.
Somehow I can't get it to make a footnote. Could you please help? Its probably child's play for you. There is so much that is false in this article, that 95% of it should be deleted. I am shocked that there is only 1 reference, even that reference (Ebel) does not accurately reflect the source. Since I have been concentrating on the Lübeck Law in my studies for the last year I could try to improve the article. Thanks, Hroberth Dunbar ( talk · contribs)
@ Tribe of Tiger:Thanks for the upload of the manuscript image, inspires me to slowly improve/ correct the article. Also, the rearranging of the introductory section is great. I am confused about signing pings with the 4 tildes, for instance, i don't see where others have done it in this thread. Do the tildes get automatically deleted once the ping has been responded to? I just noticed one can insert the tildes at the bottom here. Did it work this time? Hroberth Dunbar Hroberth Dunbar ( talk) 15:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)