![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"He proved that a honeycomb pattern is the most efficient way to pack equal circles in the Euclidean plane"
Is this correct?? Is this not the same as Thue's theorem, proved in 1909?
Shadowsill ( talk) 12:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
See User:Bikermacska/sandbox for the draft of a major expansion planned for a week, or so. It is awaiting review from subject matter experts. Please post your comments about the expansion either here or at User talk:Bikermacska/sandbox. User:HopsonRoad 20:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Just for clarification. The math project prefers the use of the term priority over importance since we are not attempting to rate how important the subject matter is in the field of mathematics (as may be the case in other projects), but rather what priority math editors should put on this when deciding to work on an article. We do things this way (not the norm in WP) since there are so many math articles and so few math editors that some sort of triage is needed. The low priority rating that I've reverted to means that, in my assessment, given the subject matter, the article appears to be in pretty good shape and the math editors need not be overly concerned about it. Of course, this does not stop anyone with an interest from contributing to the page, and I certainly hope that they will. Bill Cherowitzo ( talk) 03:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
@ HopsonRoad: The German Wikipedia article says that he was a member of the Berlin academy. Drahtlos ( talk) 17:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"He proved that a honeycomb pattern is the most efficient way to pack equal circles in the Euclidean plane"
Is this correct?? Is this not the same as Thue's theorem, proved in 1909?
Shadowsill ( talk) 12:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
See User:Bikermacska/sandbox for the draft of a major expansion planned for a week, or so. It is awaiting review from subject matter experts. Please post your comments about the expansion either here or at User talk:Bikermacska/sandbox. User:HopsonRoad 20:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Just for clarification. The math project prefers the use of the term priority over importance since we are not attempting to rate how important the subject matter is in the field of mathematics (as may be the case in other projects), but rather what priority math editors should put on this when deciding to work on an article. We do things this way (not the norm in WP) since there are so many math articles and so few math editors that some sort of triage is needed. The low priority rating that I've reverted to means that, in my assessment, given the subject matter, the article appears to be in pretty good shape and the math editors need not be overly concerned about it. Of course, this does not stop anyone with an interest from contributing to the page, and I certainly hope that they will. Bill Cherowitzo ( talk) 03:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
@ HopsonRoad: The German Wikipedia article says that he was a member of the Berlin academy. Drahtlos ( talk) 17:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)