This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
This article fails to mention anything about how every one of the North's attempts have failed. The recent attempt did not put anything into orbit.. It crashed and burned. Cs302b ( talk) 17:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Does North Korea claim that this satellite is still in orbit of Earth? DarthVad e r 07:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
The change in font indicates a direct copy and paste from a Chinese source (including quotes still in Chinese translation, not Korean or English translation) that has then been translated into stilted English by an editor. Unfortunately I don't have fluent enough Chinese ability to see if the sources are reliable or if the POV-leaning content accurately reflects the content. Any check on this, as well as any astronomy minded editors able to use online tracking sources to check up on Kwangmyongsong's existence would be helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.48.153.241 ( talk) 04:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Virtually everything in parenthesis as well as the Kim Il Sung quote are actually Chinese, not Korean...! Jpatokal ( talk) 06:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
This is not hanmun:
""Moreover, on February 25, 2009, the Iranian News Agency reported the statement of Choe Tae-bok, a high ranking DPRK official as saying: “ 我们把伊朗的所有的成功都看做是自己的成功。
We consider all Iranian technological achievements as our own achievements.""
I would really find it strange for a DPRK official saying '아문파이낭적소유적성공도간주시자기적성공.' It doesn't make sense in Korean, and it is vernacular Chinese (not to mention it is in simplified characters). Of course, it is entirely possible that the DPRK official was speaking in Chinese, but I haven't checked the source for that. 125.238.23.58 ( talk) 06:43, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I reverted some edits by User:222.214.45.162, which contain some WP:OR and WP:POV problems.
First, please show reliable sources for your contribution. He rely excessively on KCNA or Chinese news media. This North Korean rocket launching is broadly covered by the Western media, which are regarded as more reliable sources than North Korean and Chinese one.
Second, Your edits show some inappropriate contents with no reference such as:
Seems that the two sources are contradictory, Russian Space Agency saying one thing, NORAD another. Are they both still sticking to their stories? Esn ( talk) 09:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
How is it related to this.?-- yousaf465' 10:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Far better sourcing is needed for the claim Russia reported the launch of Kwangmyŏngsŏng-1 is a success. Currently it's sourced to a Chinese BBS with some rather dodgy images, in other words almost definitely not a RS. I found [1] which while not a RS, suggests the claim Russia reported the launch was a success have never been collaborated. Unless a better preferably recent source can be found, the claim Russia reported the launch a success should be removed Nil Einne ( talk) 21:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |accessyear=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
and |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |dateformat=
ignored (
help)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
This article fails to mention anything about how every one of the North's attempts have failed. The recent attempt did not put anything into orbit.. It crashed and burned. Cs302b ( talk) 17:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Does North Korea claim that this satellite is still in orbit of Earth? DarthVad e r 07:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
The change in font indicates a direct copy and paste from a Chinese source (including quotes still in Chinese translation, not Korean or English translation) that has then been translated into stilted English by an editor. Unfortunately I don't have fluent enough Chinese ability to see if the sources are reliable or if the POV-leaning content accurately reflects the content. Any check on this, as well as any astronomy minded editors able to use online tracking sources to check up on Kwangmyongsong's existence would be helpful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.48.153.241 ( talk) 04:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Virtually everything in parenthesis as well as the Kim Il Sung quote are actually Chinese, not Korean...! Jpatokal ( talk) 06:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
This is not hanmun:
""Moreover, on February 25, 2009, the Iranian News Agency reported the statement of Choe Tae-bok, a high ranking DPRK official as saying: “ 我们把伊朗的所有的成功都看做是自己的成功。
We consider all Iranian technological achievements as our own achievements.""
I would really find it strange for a DPRK official saying '아문파이낭적소유적성공도간주시자기적성공.' It doesn't make sense in Korean, and it is vernacular Chinese (not to mention it is in simplified characters). Of course, it is entirely possible that the DPRK official was speaking in Chinese, but I haven't checked the source for that. 125.238.23.58 ( talk) 06:43, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I reverted some edits by User:222.214.45.162, which contain some WP:OR and WP:POV problems.
First, please show reliable sources for your contribution. He rely excessively on KCNA or Chinese news media. This North Korean rocket launching is broadly covered by the Western media, which are regarded as more reliable sources than North Korean and Chinese one.
Second, Your edits show some inappropriate contents with no reference such as:
Seems that the two sources are contradictory, Russian Space Agency saying one thing, NORAD another. Are they both still sticking to their stories? Esn ( talk) 09:35, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
How is it related to this.?-- yousaf465' 10:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Far better sourcing is needed for the claim Russia reported the launch of Kwangmyŏngsŏng-1 is a success. Currently it's sourced to a Chinese BBS with some rather dodgy images, in other words almost definitely not a RS. I found [1] which while not a RS, suggests the claim Russia reported the launch was a success have never been collaborated. Unless a better preferably recent source can be found, the claim Russia reported the launch a success should be removed Nil Einne ( talk) 21:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Unknown parameter |accessyear=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
and |date=
(
help); Unknown parameter |dateformat=
ignored (
help)