Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 20:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Two images of Mahamaham are not needed. Also, the infobox image should have a contemporary image of Kumbakonam, say that the most important monument/temple. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 03:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- There are good pictures with suitable licenses on flickr too: [1]. Let me know if specific temple images are needed. I will search flickr. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 05:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, there are images with suitable licenses. But I would not consider them "good". Most of the photos are of the Sarangapani temple, Kumbeshwarar temple and the few other main temples. The rest are simply captioned "friendly people from kumbakonam", "Kumbakonam colourful streets", or "Kumbakonam nice architecture". I am not able to make out what places they depict.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 14:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B.
MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C.
No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding it GA-status - well deserved. Pyrotec ( talk) 11:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! :-)- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 14:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec ( talk) 20:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Two images of Mahamaham are not needed. Also, the infobox image should have a contemporary image of Kumbakonam, say that the most important monument/temple. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 03:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- There are good pictures with suitable licenses on flickr too: [1]. Let me know if specific temple images are needed. I will search flickr. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 05:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, there are images with suitable licenses. But I would not consider them "good". Most of the photos are of the Sarangapani temple, Kumbeshwarar temple and the few other main temples. The rest are simply captioned "friendly people from kumbakonam", "Kumbakonam colourful streets", or "Kumbakonam nice architecture". I am not able to make out what places they depict.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 14:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B.
MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C.
No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding it GA-status - well deserved. Pyrotec ( talk) 11:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! :-)- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 14:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)