Kubutz and Shuruk are distinct symbols, but they are very closely related, more so than zeirei/seggol or kamatz/patakh. So it makes sense that Shuruk redirects here. Maybe we can go further and rename this article to Kubutz and Shuruk? -- Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 15:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The letter Bet in the word קבוץ holds a strong Dagesh, therefore I think it would be better to spell the word in English "Kubbutz". Kulystab ( talk) 00:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Doesn't need to go in the article, but some people traditionally called it "m'loo-pm". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18C:8602:73F0:3C85:9CA:3C25:F575 ( talk) 01:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
the "rule" for modern usage is written badly, saying "final vowel or in open syllables word internally" and contradicts itself 2 lines ahead with the example xa'tul --- /tul/ to me is not an open syllable, as to anyone who can read ... nor does the word have a final vowel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.192.37.76 ( talk) 06:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Is this Dissimilation rule appropriate to add to the article or does is it too detailed to justify having it? Perhaps it is already there and I missed it.
https://www.academia.edu/30031251/BIBLICAL_HEBREW_pdf "When prefixed to a word beginning with a bilabial (“two lips”) consonant (b m p), or to a word that has åewa as the first vowel, the conjunction becomes ." MichelleInSanMarcos ( talk) 12:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Kubutz and Shuruk are distinct symbols, but they are very closely related, more so than zeirei/seggol or kamatz/patakh. So it makes sense that Shuruk redirects here. Maybe we can go further and rename this article to Kubutz and Shuruk? -- Amir E. Aharoni ( talk) 15:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The letter Bet in the word קבוץ holds a strong Dagesh, therefore I think it would be better to spell the word in English "Kubbutz". Kulystab ( talk) 00:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Doesn't need to go in the article, but some people traditionally called it "m'loo-pm". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18C:8602:73F0:3C85:9CA:3C25:F575 ( talk) 01:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
the "rule" for modern usage is written badly, saying "final vowel or in open syllables word internally" and contradicts itself 2 lines ahead with the example xa'tul --- /tul/ to me is not an open syllable, as to anyone who can read ... nor does the word have a final vowel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.192.37.76 ( talk) 06:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Is this Dissimilation rule appropriate to add to the article or does is it too detailed to justify having it? Perhaps it is already there and I missed it.
https://www.academia.edu/30031251/BIBLICAL_HEBREW_pdf "When prefixed to a word beginning with a bilabial (“two lips”) consonant (b m p), or to a word that has åewa as the first vowel, the conjunction becomes ." MichelleInSanMarcos ( talk) 12:04, 13 July 2022 (UTC)