This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This version uses reliable sources unlike a related, but distinct previous version, which was deleted for
WP:NEO (see
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murder_Kroger). So this is not a "repost"; it is not about a word. It's about a store. I've demonstrated notability here by the coverage so that we actually have an article instead of it being a meaningless
WP:CHAIN. There has been coverage, particularly in the AJC (which was requested in the WP:NEO deletion discussion). Now that coverage has been provided. We have ourselves a legitimate article. I'm not sure the speedy was appropriate, given that the title and topic are completely different. Could someone please remove the speedy? Thanks.
Biosthmors (
talk)
12:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This version uses reliable sources unlike a related, but distinct previous version, which was deleted for
WP:NEO (see
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murder_Kroger). So this is not a "repost"; it is not about a word. It's about a store. I've demonstrated notability here by the coverage so that we actually have an article instead of it being a meaningless
WP:CHAIN. There has been coverage, particularly in the AJC (which was requested in the WP:NEO deletion discussion). Now that coverage has been provided. We have ourselves a legitimate article. I'm not sure the speedy was appropriate, given that the title and topic are completely different. Could someone please remove the speedy? Thanks.
Biosthmors (
talk)
12:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)reply