This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Krishnan Guru-Murthy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Why do the British allow this fat, ugly fuckwad to appear on television and conduct himself like such a self-righteous dick?
Added reference (after a bit of searching!) to the Rock Band - seems Krishnan himself has admitted to this in a column he writes in The Guardian. 82.46.94.109 13:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The infobox states that he is a Sikh. All Sikh males have the middle or last name Singh. Central to being a Sikh is growing one's hair long and wearing a turban. Guru-Murthy's hair is far too short for him to be following Sikhism, and he does not wear a turban. Werdnawerdna ( talk) 02:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hardly the biggest thing on the page, but we may as well get it right one way or the other and keep it that way. I know this material is sourced, but WP:RS doesn't mean that we can just drag anything off the internet and claim that it should also then go into a WP page. The source has to be reliable - an obscure religious magazine which mentions this in passing almost certainly doesn't qualify as far as I can see. I had a quick look around and can't see any other online source for this. I'm tempted to remove it, per Insider1970 but will happily wait for some input from those returning it each time. -- Nickhh ( talk) 16:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The 'source' is totally unreliable and wrong. Unless anyone can come up with any evidence beyond this obscure article which they will not be able to do because it is wrong please stop putting the line back in.
Since 'anchor' is an americanism and is not widely used in the UK to describe a presenter of a news programme, surely the word 'newsreader' is more appropriate? 86.128.122.167 ( talk) 17:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone understand what this is trying to say?
Tarantino tried to answer even after Guru-Murthy kept reverting around to the point,
If so, could you rewrite it to make sense? Ashmoo ( talk) 14:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Krishnan Guru-Murthy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Why do the British allow this fat, ugly fuckwad to appear on television and conduct himself like such a self-righteous dick?
Added reference (after a bit of searching!) to the Rock Band - seems Krishnan himself has admitted to this in a column he writes in The Guardian. 82.46.94.109 13:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The infobox states that he is a Sikh. All Sikh males have the middle or last name Singh. Central to being a Sikh is growing one's hair long and wearing a turban. Guru-Murthy's hair is far too short for him to be following Sikhism, and he does not wear a turban. Werdnawerdna ( talk) 02:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hardly the biggest thing on the page, but we may as well get it right one way or the other and keep it that way. I know this material is sourced, but WP:RS doesn't mean that we can just drag anything off the internet and claim that it should also then go into a WP page. The source has to be reliable - an obscure religious magazine which mentions this in passing almost certainly doesn't qualify as far as I can see. I had a quick look around and can't see any other online source for this. I'm tempted to remove it, per Insider1970 but will happily wait for some input from those returning it each time. -- Nickhh ( talk) 16:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The 'source' is totally unreliable and wrong. Unless anyone can come up with any evidence beyond this obscure article which they will not be able to do because it is wrong please stop putting the line back in.
Since 'anchor' is an americanism and is not widely used in the UK to describe a presenter of a news programme, surely the word 'newsreader' is more appropriate? 86.128.122.167 ( talk) 17:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone understand what this is trying to say?
Tarantino tried to answer even after Guru-Murthy kept reverting around to the point,
If so, could you rewrite it to make sense? Ashmoo ( talk) 14:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)