Korowai gecko is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for
amphibians and
reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New Zealand and
New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of
Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
A fact from Korowai gecko appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that
off-roading at
Muriwai Beach in New Zealand may be damaging the habitat of the newly described korowai gecko(example pictured)?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: The iNaturalist image is technically not research-grade, but is definitely correct, as the photo was taken by the herpetologist who described the species (i.e. iNaturalist hasn't put the species in their database yet).
Article new enough and long enough. Article is fully cited, sources are neutral, and information is presented neutrally. The hook is cited and verified. No policy issues are seen in the hook or the article, no close paraphrasing or copyvios identified. Image is appropriately licensed for main page and thumbnail is identifiable. Looks good to go.--
Kevmin§18:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Korowai gecko is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for
amphibians and
reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New Zealand and
New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of
Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
A fact from Korowai gecko appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that
off-roading at
Muriwai Beach in New Zealand may be damaging the habitat of the newly described korowai gecko(example pictured)?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: The iNaturalist image is technically not research-grade, but is definitely correct, as the photo was taken by the herpetologist who described the species (i.e. iNaturalist hasn't put the species in their database yet).
Article new enough and long enough. Article is fully cited, sources are neutral, and information is presented neutrally. The hook is cited and verified. No policy issues are seen in the hook or the article, no close paraphrasing or copyvios identified. Image is appropriately licensed for main page and thumbnail is identifiable. Looks good to go.--
Kevmin§18:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply