![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
http://failblog.org/2010/02/04/stone-sculpture-fail/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.177.239 ( talk) 14:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
this is a re-touched photograph. This awful carving is the support for the statue of the bishop. They have jiggered with the photo to remove the bishop & just show the support. This creates the false impression the carving is of the bishop, which it is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.48.71.75 ( talk) 14:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
The photo is authentic, the statue was being mended elsewhere at that time. It is from the town hall, though, as stated below the other image. Benito ( talk) 14:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Why is that the base of the statue?--
Keesto (
talk)
02:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Seriously, how has this not been addressed? How is that not in the article proper? Someone with actual information on this subject, please elucidate us on the matter. -- Random Internet Person Checking Up On Facebook Image Only To Find Next To No Information On Wikipedia 20:30, 11 January 2015
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
http://failblog.org/2010/02/04/stone-sculpture-fail/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.177.239 ( talk) 14:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
this is a re-touched photograph. This awful carving is the support for the statue of the bishop. They have jiggered with the photo to remove the bishop & just show the support. This creates the false impression the carving is of the bishop, which it is not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.48.71.75 ( talk) 14:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
The photo is authentic, the statue was being mended elsewhere at that time. It is from the town hall, though, as stated below the other image. Benito ( talk) 14:32, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Why is that the base of the statue?--
Keesto (
talk)
02:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Seriously, how has this not been addressed? How is that not in the article proper? Someone with actual information on this subject, please elucidate us on the matter. -- Random Internet Person Checking Up On Facebook Image Only To Find Next To No Information On Wikipedia 20:30, 11 January 2015