This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:  • Kongka Pass Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:  • Talk:Kongka Pass

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Cold War C‑class This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) China Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. India Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not sure why Adamgerber80 would turn the article into a redirect. It is well sourced, the event appear to be notable, satisfying the criteria of WP:GNG, therefore it can exist as an article. Valid reason needs to be given for reverting it into a redirect. Hzh ( talk) 08:58, 22 August 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Hzh: If you look closely at the article history, it was crated by a sockpuppet User:Dali0Lama ( talk · contribs). My strong recommendation would be to open a discussion on Kongka Pass to create a WP:FORK and then take it from there. A better idea would be to first populate the content on that page and see if it can even be forked. Apart from this, the page has multiple issues of WP:NPOV and needs WP:RS at quite a few places. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 23:09, 23 August 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Adamgerber80: Who it was written by is of little relevance. As long as it satisfies the criteria for WP:GNG I don't see any issue with it. If you have any issue with WP:NPOV, the problematic sentences can be rewritten/removed/tag added. There is simply no reason to turn it into redirect if it is notable, and really, such discussion is unnecessary. Kongka Pass incident is not a fork of Kongka Pass, in as much as Nanking Incident is not a fork of Nanking. They describe separate things, one a historical event, the other a geographical location. Hzh ( talk) 14:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC) reply

When a article is created by a user who is evading a block we generally nominate it for a CSD. Since this is a redirect, I reverted it back to a redirect. If you wish to take liability for their edits, then you are free to reinstate their edits. I still feel it would be a good exercise to discuss the forking of such a page before it is created. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 22:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply