![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Kohalogo-w.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Openly ( talk) 12:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC) I've added a bit of context to the history section, but wanted to comment on the general tone of the article- if others agree, please edit. The description sounds as if cut and paste from a marketing presentation; a summary from one of the many article comparing advantages and disadvantages of other FOSS ILS systems would make the article more useful. The list of ILS systems seems out of place; a templated table to place on all the ILS system articles would fit Wikipedia better. The listing of git repository statistics also seems excessive and should be removed.
Here are some improvements that should happen (none of which risk point-of-view issues and so can be done by members of the koha community) Stuartyeates ( talk) 21:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Koha (software) → Koha (koha-community.org software) — These two pages are about forks of a software project. Both groups call their software by the same name (one group coined the name, the other has the US trademark on it). The move is a step towards clarity and resolving persistent POV issues with these articles (see their histories). Once the communities have clearly separate pages hopefully POV issues will abate. The new names were chosen with regard to WP:PRECISE and the fact that their respective domains are the least-loaded and least-controversial descriptions I could come up with, as per WP:POVTITLE. After the move Koha (software) should redirect to the Koha disambiguation page and LibLime should be a redirect to Koha (koha.org software). After the move someone will need to: add a hatnote to each of the articles pointing to the other; update the Koha disambiguation; trawl through and update various redirects in place at the moment. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Should the international conferences be added into the existing history section, or in a new Conferences section? Dates, locations and links at the very least. Sekjal ( talk) 17:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Koha (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Koha (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I've just reverted the following from an Indian IP:
I've considered whether some point are worth keeping - but while all of it is true, it's hare to believe that any of this is news to any but the most naive. - Snori ( talk) 07:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
>>> Not able to find enough justification as to why these are removed. What I have written are truth. People do face these difficulties. Please modify if necessary but create a section called Risks portion. Make the article fair by giving a true picture whether positive or negative. Removing the risks portion is unjust. BangaloreWiki. 7th Jan 2018
These are related to open source software in general, not just Koha. Therefore it should not be part of this page. 91.156.244.41 ( talk) 16:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The source for the updated item and user counts are from https://kohapakistan.org/ in the carousel. But within few months the video won't be here anymore. The video is archived on https://web.archive.org but having it in it's context would be much cleaner. The video isn't viewable in the archived version of kohapakistan.org -- Tuxayo ( talk) 16:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Kohalogo-w.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Openly ( talk) 12:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC) I've added a bit of context to the history section, but wanted to comment on the general tone of the article- if others agree, please edit. The description sounds as if cut and paste from a marketing presentation; a summary from one of the many article comparing advantages and disadvantages of other FOSS ILS systems would make the article more useful. The list of ILS systems seems out of place; a templated table to place on all the ILS system articles would fit Wikipedia better. The listing of git repository statistics also seems excessive and should be removed.
Here are some improvements that should happen (none of which risk point-of-view issues and so can be done by members of the koha community) Stuartyeates ( talk) 21:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Koha (software) → Koha (koha-community.org software) — These two pages are about forks of a software project. Both groups call their software by the same name (one group coined the name, the other has the US trademark on it). The move is a step towards clarity and resolving persistent POV issues with these articles (see their histories). Once the communities have clearly separate pages hopefully POV issues will abate. The new names were chosen with regard to WP:PRECISE and the fact that their respective domains are the least-loaded and least-controversial descriptions I could come up with, as per WP:POVTITLE. After the move Koha (software) should redirect to the Koha disambiguation page and LibLime should be a redirect to Koha (koha.org software). After the move someone will need to: add a hatnote to each of the articles pointing to the other; update the Koha disambiguation; trawl through and update various redirects in place at the moment. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Should the international conferences be added into the existing history section, or in a new Conferences section? Dates, locations and links at the very least. Sekjal ( talk) 17:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Koha (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:33, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Koha (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
I've just reverted the following from an Indian IP:
I've considered whether some point are worth keeping - but while all of it is true, it's hare to believe that any of this is news to any but the most naive. - Snori ( talk) 07:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
>>> Not able to find enough justification as to why these are removed. What I have written are truth. People do face these difficulties. Please modify if necessary but create a section called Risks portion. Make the article fair by giving a true picture whether positive or negative. Removing the risks portion is unjust. BangaloreWiki. 7th Jan 2018
These are related to open source software in general, not just Koha. Therefore it should not be part of this page. 91.156.244.41 ( talk) 16:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The source for the updated item and user counts are from https://kohapakistan.org/ in the carousel. But within few months the video won't be here anymore. The video is archived on https://web.archive.org but having it in it's context would be much cleaner. The video isn't viewable in the archived version of kohapakistan.org -- Tuxayo ( talk) 16:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)