This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anyone has sources about the reaction of the arabic israeli press? I'm pretty sure that there were some reaction in al-itihad rakah's paper but i don't have access to their archive.... Anyone?
Its quite funny that the article doesn't say anything about the reaction of the Israeli arabs about a report that dealt with the policy of the gevernment towards them. -- Histolo2 ( talk) 10:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Has the Koening Memorandum ever been compared to the (supposedly forged) Protocols of the Elders of Zion ? Because that's what it looks like, it's basically a Zionist conspiracy, originating from the Israeli government itself, which deliberately attempts to weaken the local Gentile population in order to prepare further property seizures. ADM ( talk) 09:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koenig Memorandum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anyone has sources about the reaction of the arabic israeli press? I'm pretty sure that there were some reaction in al-itihad rakah's paper but i don't have access to their archive.... Anyone?
Its quite funny that the article doesn't say anything about the reaction of the Israeli arabs about a report that dealt with the policy of the gevernment towards them. -- Histolo2 ( talk) 10:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Has the Koening Memorandum ever been compared to the (supposedly forged) Protocols of the Elders of Zion ? Because that's what it looks like, it's basically a Zionist conspiracy, originating from the Israeli government itself, which deliberately attempts to weaken the local Gentile population in order to prepare further property seizures. ADM ( talk) 09:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Koenig Memorandum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)