This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand: Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the New Zealand law task force. Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I have cited in this very article proof of its relevance, a book that is widely used in NZ law schools. In light of this, I find it bizarre that it is not only tagged for deletion, but a speedy one at that. Has this member not got better things to do?

• Apologies, was a small mistake. Wasn't quite aware of what you had said. Cheers! → εϻαd ιν ^ΤαΙk _{Ͼδητrιβμτιoης} 16:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC) reply

thanks for the apology...