Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Cool! Just one thing: the url in ref #15 is incorrect. Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I fixed the link it seems the page was removed but I found a Google cache of it. Would that work? ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 09:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you Alucard, I appreciate you fixing the link. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply

No problem ThinkBlue, glad to help. Nice to take a break from Big Brother articles once in a while. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 01:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Good :) Tis a pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Klaus and Greta passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass