![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kinlock Shelter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fangfufu ( talk) 03:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The non-redundant portion of the discussion that followed the prod on my talk page (
talk) can be found below:
::Disagree. The location has intrinsic cultural significance. It is mentioned or featured in several publications, has been featured in a television program on Alabama Public Television, and is well known to frequent visitors of
Bankhead National Forest and
Sipsey Wilderness, and the local native-american population. I will concede that the article could use some improvement, and I will carry out such improvement, but it is not worthy of deletion.
Jo7hs2
The result of the discussion was that the article was kept. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 20:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I am removing the unsourced tag from this article. There is a source cited. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 17:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the cleanup notice. Both myself and the individual placing the notice have improve the article to the point where I feel comfortable removing it. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 16:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
I have added stub status to this article. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 16:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kinlock Shelter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fangfufu ( talk) 03:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The non-redundant portion of the discussion that followed the prod on my talk page (
talk) can be found below:
::Disagree. The location has intrinsic cultural significance. It is mentioned or featured in several publications, has been featured in a television program on Alabama Public Television, and is well known to frequent visitors of
Bankhead National Forest and
Sipsey Wilderness, and the local native-american population. I will concede that the article could use some improvement, and I will carry out such improvement, but it is not worthy of deletion.
Jo7hs2
The result of the discussion was that the article was kept. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 20:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I am removing the unsourced tag from this article. There is a source cited. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 17:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the cleanup notice. Both myself and the individual placing the notice have improve the article to the point where I feel comfortable removing it. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 16:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
I have added stub status to this article. Jo7hs2 ( talk) 16:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)