This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
King of Bahrain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Did the title change from Emir to King make any substantial difference in the government? I thought the title was arbitrary: a ruler could call himself prince, duke, emir, king, sultan, or emperor, and the government would have the same structure. Inkan1969 ( talk) 19:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Is a table really necessary for this article? The Emirs number two, and Kings number one currently. The Hakims are not so numerous either that a simple list does not work. The table is bulky, takes up space and adds nothing.
Η936631
(talk)
19:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
User:Sadadi (
contributions) seems to have introduced a lot of ibn instead of bin into the titles of many links and some articles. It's probably worth checking into the accounts edits to check no more errors have been added. Cheers,
Jack (
talk)
00:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
King of Bahrain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Did the title change from Emir to King make any substantial difference in the government? I thought the title was arbitrary: a ruler could call himself prince, duke, emir, king, sultan, or emperor, and the government would have the same structure. Inkan1969 ( talk) 19:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Is a table really necessary for this article? The Emirs number two, and Kings number one currently. The Hakims are not so numerous either that a simple list does not work. The table is bulky, takes up space and adds nothing.
Η936631
(talk)
19:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
User:Sadadi (
contributions) seems to have introduced a lot of ibn instead of bin into the titles of many links and some articles. It's probably worth checking into the accounts edits to check no more errors have been added. Cheers,
Jack (
talk)
00:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)