Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: Epicgenius ( talk · contribs) 01:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Reconrabbit ( talk · contribs) 20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

This nomination has been collecting dust for long enough. Here's my effort on reviewing it. Recon rabbit 20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

• All good. Doesn't look like there are any obvious historical records of specific native groups in the Jamaica region that the land was bought from to go into further detail. Y

• Very little if any vandalism. No edit wars as I can see. Stable, main changes in the months since nomination have been copy-edits. Y

• Multiref (unbulleted list citebundle) is used inconsistently in places. E.g., it's used for [80] but not [244].
  • Good point. I've consistently formatted all refs where multiple citations were used. Epicgenius ( talk) 23:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Based on this revision:

• Very low % score on Earwig. I can't check the Google results but I'll trust what Morogris said on the DYK nomination.

• Images have appropriate use rationales/are all under appropriate licenses. Most are "own work". They are also placed in places where it makes sense. I would say that the article could do with more images of the interior, but it's certainly not within the scope of this review and one can paint a picture with words here. It's not the most unique house in New York.
  • Yeah... sadly I didn't have the opportunity to photograph the house back when I was in the area last year. I might not be able to drop by for a while, anyway, due to how busy I am in real life. Epicgenius ( talk) 23:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply
    • A concern for higher-level scrutiny for sure. It's good to know what it looks like from the outside and inside on a base level, and we have that. Recon rabbit 00:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• The caption of the first image under section "Architecture" could use a better caption than "Rufus King home". It's also got a "Rufus King Jamaica Ave" watermark on it?
  • I've changed the caption and might crop out the watermark later. Epicgenius ( talk) 23:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply
• Some of these images are also uploaded by "King Manor Association". Good on them if it's the real association putting up these freely usable photos but it would be nice to confirm if that's accurate.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed