![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed vandilised college motto. DevAnubis 08:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Just a suggestion - would it not be wise to include a list of studied subjects at King Ed's?
Or at least a list of departments.. Maybe in this format:
Department
Head of Department
Subjects included in department
I think the HoD is a must since there is more than one that is "externally" well-known within their field.
I also think there should be a separate section for EdPod and Folding@Home.
Maybe "College Clubs" or "Student organisations"?
Also possibly remove the NPOV tag - I don't see what's wrong with the article now?
Worley-d 22:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I have to diasgree - this is widely accepted. I can quite easily source the college results. The college's record IS extremely impressive - whichever way you look at it. I see your point with the "finest educational insitutions yadayadayada" but the college's record is a matter of fact, not opinion. Worley-d 01:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Incidentally, the one part I *would* note as biased is the EdPod section - it's certainly advertising in my eyes. Are we not supposed to find out what's in it for ourself? Worley-d 01:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough. I'll trawl through the Express and Star archives and see what I can come up with. When you say state the scores you basically mean give examples: i.e. 100% pass rate in most subjects? and so on?
Can I copy a source directly as long as I immediately quote the source afterwards? Worley-d 21:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I've attatched the Virginia Tech Ribbon to this article, I don't intend on leaving it there forever, I figured it might be a nice gesture for a few weeks. I forget to remove it, then could somebody do it for me in about 6 weeks time or so? Of course, if you think it should stay, then feel free to leave it? 90.192.84.121 19:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Collegelogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
The grammar within this article is appalling considering how boastful it is of its academic credentials. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.88.218 ( talk) 21:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
The articloe has undergone a major cleanup by the WP:GOCE and WP:SCHOOLS in September 2010. -- Kudpung ( talk) 00:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the unsourced controversy section to here:
Protest controversy: The college caused controversy when it was revealed that in November 2010 a member of college staff had circulated an email encouraging students to attend a left wing demo in London. Whilst the leaked email seemed to imply that any absence from college would be unauthorized, the message strongly persuaded and encouraged students to attend. The controversy was heightened, when it was reported by the local press in late 2010 that a college student had actually been arrested for causing criminal damage at Conservative headquarters in London.
--
Kudpung (
talk)
06:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fixed vandilised college motto. DevAnubis 08:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Just a suggestion - would it not be wise to include a list of studied subjects at King Ed's?
Or at least a list of departments.. Maybe in this format:
Department
Head of Department
Subjects included in department
I think the HoD is a must since there is more than one that is "externally" well-known within their field.
I also think there should be a separate section for EdPod and Folding@Home.
Maybe "College Clubs" or "Student organisations"?
Also possibly remove the NPOV tag - I don't see what's wrong with the article now?
Worley-d 22:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I have to diasgree - this is widely accepted. I can quite easily source the college results. The college's record IS extremely impressive - whichever way you look at it. I see your point with the "finest educational insitutions yadayadayada" but the college's record is a matter of fact, not opinion. Worley-d 01:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Incidentally, the one part I *would* note as biased is the EdPod section - it's certainly advertising in my eyes. Are we not supposed to find out what's in it for ourself? Worley-d 01:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough. I'll trawl through the Express and Star archives and see what I can come up with. When you say state the scores you basically mean give examples: i.e. 100% pass rate in most subjects? and so on?
Can I copy a source directly as long as I immediately quote the source afterwards? Worley-d 21:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I've attatched the Virginia Tech Ribbon to this article, I don't intend on leaving it there forever, I figured it might be a nice gesture for a few weeks. I forget to remove it, then could somebody do it for me in about 6 weeks time or so? Of course, if you think it should stay, then feel free to leave it? 90.192.84.121 19:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Collegelogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
The grammar within this article is appalling considering how boastful it is of its academic credentials. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.88.218 ( talk) 21:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
The articloe has undergone a major cleanup by the WP:GOCE and WP:SCHOOLS in September 2010. -- Kudpung ( talk) 00:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the unsourced controversy section to here:
Protest controversy: The college caused controversy when it was revealed that in November 2010 a member of college staff had circulated an email encouraging students to attend a left wing demo in London. Whilst the leaked email seemed to imply that any absence from college would be unauthorized, the message strongly persuaded and encouraged students to attend. The controversy was heightened, when it was reported by the local press in late 2010 that a college student had actually been arrested for causing criminal damage at Conservative headquarters in London.
--
Kudpung (
talk)
06:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)