This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Image:Kgnofficial.jpg.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Is there any information out on the net that shows that Kimberly has had plastic surgery, botox, cologene, etc? TVKingdom 07:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.95.51.85 ( talk)
Should "modeled for local department stores, including Macy's, and modeled Victoria's Secret lingerie in a bridal magazine" be in "Education"? It is interesting and highly relevant information but it seems to me to be irrelevant to education. Sam Tomato ( talk) 16:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
The article uses the "Infobox officeholder" template, when it should use the "Infobox person" template. Guilfoyle has never been elected to a public office. Calling her as First Lady of San Francisco an "officeholder" is equivalent to calling George W. Bush's dog Barney as First Dog an "officeholder". Absurd. It may not be stolen valor in Wikipedia, but it comes close. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum) T @ 22:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
I didn’t know that info box Office Holder has there in August, 2020. I assumed since she was still legally married to Newsom at the time, that made her First Lady of San Francisco for two years. Admiral Farmer ( talk) 00:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Again, not an elected or other "official" office. Avocats ( talk) 01:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Several citables sources reporting. Wikipietime ( talk) 13:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kimberly Guilfoyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
I deleted the statement about harassment as it was presented as a fact based on a citation that says allegation. In view of BLP, nothing derogatory should be stated about this person except with solid proof, at least 2 reliable secondary sources which base their claims on known verified primary sources. Also harassment is a weasel word; if some harassment occurred, the specific evil deed should be delineated and at least 2 reliable witnesses of it on some specific date or dates and places should be the evidence.( PeacePeace ( talk) 06:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC))
This strikes me as trivia and recentism. Regardless of being reported in reliable sources - 2,700,000 americans have been diagnosed with covid-19. This will cease being newsworthy in about 36 hours, assuming she doesn't die from it. WP:SOWHAT. Anastrophe ( talk) 17:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Trinity College Dublin Unless she attended by a different name she has never attended Trinity College Dublin. I've scoured their alumni lists from 1989-2006. Also searched all research publications. The only thing close came in reference to the medical school division citing a K. Guilfoyle as a research partner in children with disabilities and technology use in 2013. Which does not align with what is on her page stating "international children's rights and European Economic Community law. When you click on citation [13] and then you click on the cited Fox News bio link it gives you an error message and page not found. I'm in the UK and have also scoured many a different search engines for either one or both of theses "published" research papers. I can find nothing. I've also reached out to Trinity College Dublin but alas they cannot confirm (or deny) anything about any past, current or expected students due to recently passed privacy legislation. So the only cited source directs you to a "page not found" on Fox News archives. HokiePoe ( talk) 10:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
This will probably sound naive, but shouldn't her bio be taken at face value considering she is a former assistant district attorney? Unless there's something from sources to be trusted that say she's a liar, that is. A4M2 Alaska4Me2 ( talk) 19:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC) No one's perfect, but I think it seems unlikely that would happen for both the district attorney of San Francisco and Los Angeles. A4M2 Alaska4Me2 ( talk) 20:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
From the article: "In May 2018, news leaked that Guilfoyle was dating Donald Trump Jr. while he was separated but still married to his wife, after the two attended an event together.[43] Guilfoyle had been friends with the Trump family for years.[44]" There are two problems with this. 1) the citations do not say what the article says, and 2) this is not based on reporting from reliable sources, it is gossip from tabloids. Not worthy of an encyclopedic article. Please remove. 192.107.159.198 ( talk) 18:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The article states about Guilfoyle's father Tony:
"Until his death in 2008, he was a close advisor to his son-in-law, then-San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom."
But later in the article it is stated about the marriage between Kimberly Guilfoyle and Gavin Newsom:
"Their divorce was final on February 28, 2006."
If these are both correct, they contradict each other: After a divorce, one's ex's parent is no longer an in-law.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Image:Kgnofficial.jpg.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Is there any information out on the net that shows that Kimberly has had plastic surgery, botox, cologene, etc? TVKingdom 07:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.95.51.85 ( talk)
Should "modeled for local department stores, including Macy's, and modeled Victoria's Secret lingerie in a bridal magazine" be in "Education"? It is interesting and highly relevant information but it seems to me to be irrelevant to education. Sam Tomato ( talk) 16:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
The article uses the "Infobox officeholder" template, when it should use the "Infobox person" template. Guilfoyle has never been elected to a public office. Calling her as First Lady of San Francisco an "officeholder" is equivalent to calling George W. Bush's dog Barney as First Dog an "officeholder". Absurd. It may not be stolen valor in Wikipedia, but it comes close. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum) T @ 22:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
I didn’t know that info box Office Holder has there in August, 2020. I assumed since she was still legally married to Newsom at the time, that made her First Lady of San Francisco for two years. Admiral Farmer ( talk) 00:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Again, not an elected or other "official" office. Avocats ( talk) 01:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Several citables sources reporting. Wikipietime ( talk) 13:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kimberly Guilfoyle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot ( talk) 21:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
I deleted the statement about harassment as it was presented as a fact based on a citation that says allegation. In view of BLP, nothing derogatory should be stated about this person except with solid proof, at least 2 reliable secondary sources which base their claims on known verified primary sources. Also harassment is a weasel word; if some harassment occurred, the specific evil deed should be delineated and at least 2 reliable witnesses of it on some specific date or dates and places should be the evidence.( PeacePeace ( talk) 06:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC))
This strikes me as trivia and recentism. Regardless of being reported in reliable sources - 2,700,000 americans have been diagnosed with covid-19. This will cease being newsworthy in about 36 hours, assuming she doesn't die from it. WP:SOWHAT. Anastrophe ( talk) 17:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Trinity College Dublin Unless she attended by a different name she has never attended Trinity College Dublin. I've scoured their alumni lists from 1989-2006. Also searched all research publications. The only thing close came in reference to the medical school division citing a K. Guilfoyle as a research partner in children with disabilities and technology use in 2013. Which does not align with what is on her page stating "international children's rights and European Economic Community law. When you click on citation [13] and then you click on the cited Fox News bio link it gives you an error message and page not found. I'm in the UK and have also scoured many a different search engines for either one or both of theses "published" research papers. I can find nothing. I've also reached out to Trinity College Dublin but alas they cannot confirm (or deny) anything about any past, current or expected students due to recently passed privacy legislation. So the only cited source directs you to a "page not found" on Fox News archives. HokiePoe ( talk) 10:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
This will probably sound naive, but shouldn't her bio be taken at face value considering she is a former assistant district attorney? Unless there's something from sources to be trusted that say she's a liar, that is. A4M2 Alaska4Me2 ( talk) 19:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC) No one's perfect, but I think it seems unlikely that would happen for both the district attorney of San Francisco and Los Angeles. A4M2 Alaska4Me2 ( talk) 20:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
From the article: "In May 2018, news leaked that Guilfoyle was dating Donald Trump Jr. while he was separated but still married to his wife, after the two attended an event together.[43] Guilfoyle had been friends with the Trump family for years.[44]" There are two problems with this. 1) the citations do not say what the article says, and 2) this is not based on reporting from reliable sources, it is gossip from tabloids. Not worthy of an encyclopedic article. Please remove. 192.107.159.198 ( talk) 18:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The article states about Guilfoyle's father Tony:
"Until his death in 2008, he was a close advisor to his son-in-law, then-San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom."
But later in the article it is stated about the marriage between Kimberly Guilfoyle and Gavin Newsom:
"Their divorce was final on February 28, 2006."
If these are both correct, they contradict each other: After a divorce, one's ex's parent is no longer an in-law.