This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: Indigenous peoples Mid‑importance Kimberley points is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

• Akerman Kim and Bindon, Peter. 1995.Dentate and related stone biface points from Northern Australia.

The Beagle. Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory. 12:89-99.

• Akerman, Kim., Fullagar, Richard and van Gijn, Annelou. 2002. Weapons and Wunan: production, function and exchange of Kimberley points.Aboriginal Studies 2002/1:13-42.

• Akerman, Kim. 2008.‘Missing the Point’ or ‘What to Believe – the Theory or the Data’.

Rationales for the Production of Kimberley Points. Aboriginal Studies 2008/2:70-79. AIATSIS Canberra.