![]() | Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 3, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 20 November 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 November 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk
02:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Created by MagicatthemovieS ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Brian Merrett; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
MagicatthemovieS: Needs qpq and the article is semi-stable. Earwig alerts to a long quote from Jill and Joe Biden. Could be a possible ITN so we should watch there. We need a QPQ as the nominator has more than five DYKs
Lightburst (
talk) 19:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Lightburst (
talk)
19:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
FYI Ive moved the page to Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Arabic#Definite_article. nableezy - 18:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Some people online have been speculating that Czuba is Jewish, which motivated him to kill a Palestinian child. [1] [2] I added one RS to the article reporting that Czuba is a Roman Catholic who attends church with his wife. The local Patch also quotes his defense attorney as saying "Czuba also attends St. Mary's Immaculate Church in Plainfield," which confirms the source I cited but may not be RS in itself. HouseOfChange ( talk) 23:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following text to the "legal proceedings" section:
"In addition to the Justice Department's investigation, the FBI announced a separate hate crime investigation on October 16. [1] [2]" Truecrimefan22 ( talk) 09:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
References
Some reputable sources e.g.
have named the suspect, who has been indicted. Should the article do as well?
Thanks,
cmɢʟee⎆
τaʟκ
10:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Moazfargal ( talk · contribs) 19:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Davest3r08! I'll be reviewing this one. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 19:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You cite
this source in the "Killing" section. The source says that police arrived at the scene at 11:35, which is inconsistent with the attack starting at 11:38 as the secton currently states. You cite
this other source later in the article that says that the attack started 11:30 and that police arrived 11:38. Kindly fix this confusion. —M3ATH (
Moazfargal ·
Talk)
22:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done Verifiability problem solved.
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
00:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
I'll place a few suggestions for improving the article prose below. Kindly strike out those you act on, or comment if you feel differently. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 22:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
00:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
As is customary practice, I will place the review on hold for seven days until the aforementioned issues are resolved. Davest3r08, if you finish this in less than seven days, notify me here (and ping!) or on my talk page. After these issues are fixed, I will invite a more experienced reviewer (this is my first review) to chip in with their thoughts. I'll also need their help with checking the conformity with the relevant policies of the image used and checking for copyvio, as I am inexperienced in these areas. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 22:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Davest3r08, sorry for the delay. I'll be checking the article in a moment. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 16:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
@
Moazfargal Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
17:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Davest3r08, it seems there is no issue regarding copyright and the images, as far as I can understand from what I've read. Since I do not want to delay this review further, I'm going to go ahead and pass this nomination. Congrats! —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 16:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The image deletion discussion baffles me. It very obviously was not a press agency image - he was not known before he died, so it's obviously a photo taken by his family and so the copyright belonged to his family, who would have little commercial interest in exploiting the tragic loss of their son. Seeing a picture of him is obviously contextually important and standard on these kinds of pages. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 20:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 3, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 20 November 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | A fact from Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 November 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
PrimalMustelid
talk
02:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Created by MagicatthemovieS ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Brian Merrett; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
MagicatthemovieS: Needs qpq and the article is semi-stable. Earwig alerts to a long quote from Jill and Joe Biden. Could be a possible ITN so we should watch there. We need a QPQ as the nominator has more than five DYKs
Lightburst (
talk) 19:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Lightburst (
talk)
19:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
FYI Ive moved the page to Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Arabic#Definite_article. nableezy - 18:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Some people online have been speculating that Czuba is Jewish, which motivated him to kill a Palestinian child. [1] [2] I added one RS to the article reporting that Czuba is a Roman Catholic who attends church with his wife. The local Patch also quotes his defense attorney as saying "Czuba also attends St. Mary's Immaculate Church in Plainfield," which confirms the source I cited but may not be RS in itself. HouseOfChange ( talk) 23:45, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following text to the "legal proceedings" section:
"In addition to the Justice Department's investigation, the FBI announced a separate hate crime investigation on October 16. [1] [2]" Truecrimefan22 ( talk) 09:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
References
Some reputable sources e.g.
have named the suspect, who has been indicted. Should the article do as well?
Thanks,
cmɢʟee⎆
τaʟκ
10:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Moazfargal ( talk · contribs) 19:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Davest3r08! I'll be reviewing this one. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 19:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You cite
this source in the "Killing" section. The source says that police arrived at the scene at 11:35, which is inconsistent with the attack starting at 11:38 as the secton currently states. You cite
this other source later in the article that says that the attack started 11:30 and that police arrived 11:38. Kindly fix this confusion. —M3ATH (
Moazfargal ·
Talk)
22:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done Verifiability problem solved.
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
00:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
I'll place a few suggestions for improving the article prose below. Kindly strike out those you act on, or comment if you feel differently. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 22:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
00:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
23:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
As is customary practice, I will place the review on hold for seven days until the aforementioned issues are resolved. Davest3r08, if you finish this in less than seven days, notify me here (and ping!) or on my talk page. After these issues are fixed, I will invite a more experienced reviewer (this is my first review) to chip in with their thoughts. I'll also need their help with checking the conformity with the relevant policies of the image used and checking for copyvio, as I am inexperienced in these areas. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 22:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Davest3r08, sorry for the delay. I'll be checking the article in a moment. —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 16:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
@
Moazfargal Done
Davest3r08 >:) (
talk)
17:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Davest3r08, it seems there is no issue regarding copyright and the images, as far as I can understand from what I've read. Since I do not want to delay this review further, I'm going to go ahead and pass this nomination. Congrats! —M3ATH ( Moazfargal · Talk) 16:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The image deletion discussion baffles me. It very obviously was not a press agency image - he was not known before he died, so it's obviously a photo taken by his family and so the copyright belonged to his family, who would have little commercial interest in exploiting the tragic loss of their son. Seeing a picture of him is obviously contextually important and standard on these kinds of pages. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 20:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)