A fact from Killing of Nathan Heidelberg appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 March 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Daniel case Please review this article: https://www.newswest9.com/article/news/crime/trial-david-wilson-midland-police-officer-nathan-heidelberg/513-1e34dfd5-86ab-4384-898f-921bc8103f64
Amy Wilson spoke with 911 a total of 3 times. It was not until the third and final call that 911 dispatchers finally informed her that the suspects outside were actually the police.
Can you please explain how this is not a failure in communication?
Thanks SwissAmish ( talk) 19:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Addendum: I just reverted your restoration of this to the intro because, on further reflection and review of the cited source, while it is true that there were three calls between the Wilsons and 9-1-1 and only on the third one (the one initiated by dispatch) did the dispatcher inform the Wilsons that the police were already at the house, no one, not the source, not (least of all) Wilson's lawyers, have described this as a "failure". For us to say something so clearly interpretative as that without citing a reliable source saying that is impermissible original research, so we can't say it.
Also, I took out the source not only per WP:LEADCITE but also because it is also the same source we use many times in the article. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
A fact from Killing of Nathan Heidelberg appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 March 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Daniel case Please review this article: https://www.newswest9.com/article/news/crime/trial-david-wilson-midland-police-officer-nathan-heidelberg/513-1e34dfd5-86ab-4384-898f-921bc8103f64
Amy Wilson spoke with 911 a total of 3 times. It was not until the third and final call that 911 dispatchers finally informed her that the suspects outside were actually the police.
Can you please explain how this is not a failure in communication?
Thanks SwissAmish ( talk) 19:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Addendum: I just reverted your restoration of this to the intro because, on further reflection and review of the cited source, while it is true that there were three calls between the Wilsons and 9-1-1 and only on the third one (the one initiated by dispatch) did the dispatcher inform the Wilsons that the police were already at the house, no one, not the source, not (least of all) Wilson's lawyers, have described this as a "failure". For us to say something so clearly interpretative as that without citing a reliable source saying that is impermissible original research, so we can't say it.
Also, I took out the source not only per WP:LEADCITE but also because it is also the same source we use many times in the article. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)