This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The vast majority of the 160 links to the Kilburn disambiguation page are meant for this article. MRSC • Talk 11:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No Consensus to Move - note to nominator - although PRIMARY topic was the implied rationale for the move, the argument provided Other place names with that name are minor and nowhere near as notable
is invalid from a policy/guideline standpoint--WP does not weigh relative topic
WP:Notability in any policy/guideline based decision. Once deemed notable, a topic remains notable, no more, no less than any other comparable notable topic.
Mike Cline (
talk) 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
– The London district is the one main thing associated with 'Kilburn'. Other place names with that name are minor and nowhere near as notable. The current Kilburn page would be moved to a new disambiguation page. -- TransportJone ( talk) 14:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kilburn, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kilburn, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kilburn, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.london24.com/news/old-london/eight_old_pictures_of_kilburn_1_3690378When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move, i.e. dab page at the base title is generally considered as an optimal solution. No such user ( talk) 14:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
– I believe Kilburn, London is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of Kilburn. As stated on that page I have used the pageview analysis tool to compare all the listed articles on that disambiguation page solely named "Kilburn". The analysis proves that Kilburn, London is dominant out of all these links and therefore qualifies as a primary topic. Permalink of the analysis: [1].
The Kilburn disambiguation page shows that there are five articles solely bearing the name "Kilburn" apart from Kilburn, London: Kilburn, Derbyshire, Kilburn, North Yorkshire, Kilburn, South Australia, and Kilburn (surname). Here is the pageview analysis again of 5 years' data:
Because Kilburn, London, has multiple times the view numbers, edits, editors, plus size and content of the other Kilburn pages (i.e. proving popularity and long-term notability), there is no doubt in my mind that Kilburn, London is a primary topic and should be moved to
Kilburn.
References
– Jf81 ( talk) 18:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. — Nnadigoodluck ███ 19:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The vast majority of the 160 links to the Kilburn disambiguation page are meant for this article. MRSC • Talk 11:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No Consensus to Move - note to nominator - although PRIMARY topic was the implied rationale for the move, the argument provided Other place names with that name are minor and nowhere near as notable
is invalid from a policy/guideline standpoint--WP does not weigh relative topic
WP:Notability in any policy/guideline based decision. Once deemed notable, a topic remains notable, no more, no less than any other comparable notable topic.
Mike Cline (
talk) 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
– The London district is the one main thing associated with 'Kilburn'. Other place names with that name are minor and nowhere near as notable. The current Kilburn page would be moved to a new disambiguation page. -- TransportJone ( talk) 14:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kilburn, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kilburn, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kilburn, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.london24.com/news/old-london/eight_old_pictures_of_kilburn_1_3690378When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move, i.e. dab page at the base title is generally considered as an optimal solution. No such user ( talk) 14:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
– I believe Kilburn, London is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of Kilburn. As stated on that page I have used the pageview analysis tool to compare all the listed articles on that disambiguation page solely named "Kilburn". The analysis proves that Kilburn, London is dominant out of all these links and therefore qualifies as a primary topic. Permalink of the analysis: [1].
The Kilburn disambiguation page shows that there are five articles solely bearing the name "Kilburn" apart from Kilburn, London: Kilburn, Derbyshire, Kilburn, North Yorkshire, Kilburn, South Australia, and Kilburn (surname). Here is the pageview analysis again of 5 years' data:
Because Kilburn, London, has multiple times the view numbers, edits, editors, plus size and content of the other Kilburn pages (i.e. proving popularity and long-term notability), there is no doubt in my mind that Kilburn, London is a primary topic and should be moved to
Kilburn.
References
– Jf81 ( talk) 18:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. — Nnadigoodluck ███ 19:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)